We have located links that may give you full text access.
CLINICAL TRIAL
JOURNAL ARTICLE
The response to bronchodilators in adults is not predictive of bronchial-hyperreactivity.
Journal of Asthma 2009 June
BACKGROUND: In some subjects with suspected asthma who have normal spirometry, administration of bronchodilators (BD) improves expiratory flow rates. The predictive value of this phenomenon in adults is not known.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the predictive value of the response to BD for bronchial hyper-responsiveness (BHR) using the metacholine challenge test (MCT). Patients and methods. The study population included 62 non-smoking adult patients (41.9% women) 29.5 +/- 15.5 years of age (range 18-64 years) with suspected asthma with normal spirometry that underwent MCT within 1 week. The response to BD (200 mu g inhaled salbutamol) was compared between subjects with positive and negative MCT using cutoff levels of provocative concentrations of metacholine causing a 20% decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) (PC(20)) of 4 and 8 mg/mL.
RESULTS: Mean (+/- SD) baseline FEV(1) was 87.8 +/- 12% of predicted. After BD administration the mean FEV(1) increased by 4.3 +/- 3.9%. The prevalence of BHR was 17.7% and 25.8% for PC(20) for PC(20) of 4 mg/mL and 8 mg/mL, respectively. The post-BD FEV(1) increment for subjects with positive and negative MCT tests was 3.9% +/- 3.3% versus 4.4% +/- 4.1%, respectively; p = 0.89, using cutoff of 4 mg/mL. The corresponding figures for cutoff of 8 mg/ml were 4.3% +/- 3.1% vs. 4.3% +/- 4.2%, respectively; p = 0.8465. There was no correlation between post-BD FEV(1) increment and PC(20) values in patients with positive MCT test for the above-mentioned cutoff levels (correlation coefficient r = 0.1645, p = 0.6289; and r = 0.2417, p = 0.4051, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: In adults with suspected asthma who have normal spirometry, the response to BD cannot be used to predict BHR.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the predictive value of the response to BD for bronchial hyper-responsiveness (BHR) using the metacholine challenge test (MCT). Patients and methods. The study population included 62 non-smoking adult patients (41.9% women) 29.5 +/- 15.5 years of age (range 18-64 years) with suspected asthma with normal spirometry that underwent MCT within 1 week. The response to BD (200 mu g inhaled salbutamol) was compared between subjects with positive and negative MCT using cutoff levels of provocative concentrations of metacholine causing a 20% decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) (PC(20)) of 4 and 8 mg/mL.
RESULTS: Mean (+/- SD) baseline FEV(1) was 87.8 +/- 12% of predicted. After BD administration the mean FEV(1) increased by 4.3 +/- 3.9%. The prevalence of BHR was 17.7% and 25.8% for PC(20) for PC(20) of 4 mg/mL and 8 mg/mL, respectively. The post-BD FEV(1) increment for subjects with positive and negative MCT tests was 3.9% +/- 3.3% versus 4.4% +/- 4.1%, respectively; p = 0.89, using cutoff of 4 mg/mL. The corresponding figures for cutoff of 8 mg/ml were 4.3% +/- 3.1% vs. 4.3% +/- 4.2%, respectively; p = 0.8465. There was no correlation between post-BD FEV(1) increment and PC(20) values in patients with positive MCT test for the above-mentioned cutoff levels (correlation coefficient r = 0.1645, p = 0.6289; and r = 0.2417, p = 0.4051, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: In adults with suspected asthma who have normal spirometry, the response to BD cannot be used to predict BHR.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app