JOURNAL ARTICLE

Efficacy of natural health products in treating osteoporosis: what is the quality of internet patient advice?

Anne Marie Whelan, Tannis M Jurgens, Susan K Bowles, Hayley Doyle
Annals of Pharmacotherapy 2009, 43 (5): 899-907
19417114

BACKGROUND: With Canadians increasing their use of the Internet to find health-related information, especially regarding natural health products (NHPs), there is a need for high-quality, evidence-based information on Web sites to aid consumers in making informed decisions regarding the appropriate and safe use of NHPs.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the quality of Web sites that target consumers and advocate the use of NHPs in the management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women.

METHODS: Web sites were identified via the Google search engine using the key words "natural treatment osteoporosis." The first pages of the first 91 Web sites identified were assessed for relevance based on the following criteria: (1) written in English, (2) contained consumer information, and (3) claimed a benefit of a single NHP in the management of osteoporosis. This task was completed by 2 investigators; differences were resolved by consensus after discussion with the third investigator. Quality of relevant sites was assessed using an expanded DISCERN instrument that also examined the evidence supporting the claim of benefit. Additionally, readability of the sites was assessed.

RESULTS: Thirty-eight Web sites met the inclusion criteria. Using the DISCERN instrument, we found that many of the sites scored low, suggesting serious or extensive shortcomings. On many Web sites, benefit claims regarding calcium, vitamin D, phytoestrogens, dehydroepiandrosterone and vitamin K were consistent with empirical evidence. However, for other NHPs, many of these same sites made effectiveness claims that were not supported by current evidence from randomized controlled trials. Twenty-five sites did not provide information as to what resources were used to support their claims. The average reading grade score was grade 11.9 (based on US school grades) and the mean Flesch Reading Ease Score was 41.7. (A higher score out of 100 indicates ease of reading.)

CONCLUSIONS: Due to the poor quality and content from unknown sources found on some Web sites, consumers who access Web sites for information regarding the use of NHPs in osteoporosis should do so cautiously and discuss results with their healthcare providers.

Full Text Links

Find Full Text Links for this Article

Discussion

You are not logged in. Sign Up or Log In to join the discussion.

Related Papers

Remove bar
Read by QxMD icon Read
19417114
×

Save your favorite articles in one place with a free QxMD account.

×

Search Tips

Use Boolean operators: AND/OR

diabetic AND foot
diabetes OR diabetic

Exclude a word using the 'minus' sign

Virchow -triad

Use Parentheses

water AND (cup OR glass)

Add an asterisk (*) at end of a word to include word stems

Neuro* will search for Neurology, Neuroscientist, Neurological, and so on

Use quotes to search for an exact phrase

"primary prevention of cancer"
(heart or cardiac or cardio*) AND arrest -"American Heart Association"