We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in the measurement of intraocular pressure in eyes with different corneal thicknesses.
PURPOSE: To compare Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) and dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) in the evaluation of intraocular pressure (IOP) in eyes with different corneal thicknesses.
METHODS: GAT and DCT were performed in 70 eyes of 35 subjects aged between 21 and 59 years. Thirty eyes had normal, nonoperated corneas and 40 eyes had reduced central corneal thickness (CCT) following myopic photorefractive keratectomy. The GAT and DCT values were correlated to CCT and age and the agreement between both tonometers was determined by the Bland and Altman method.
RESULTS: GAT correlated strongly with CCT (p = 0.0002), but there was no correlation between DCT and CCT (p = 0.4388). No correlation was found between IOP values obtained with both devices and age. The Bland and Altman plot evidenced a lack of agreement between both tonometers with 95% limits of agreement between 1.6 and -5.6 mm Hg.
CONCLUSIONS: GAT gives significantly lower values in the eyes with thin corneas and DCT is not influenced by CCT. DCT could be recommended to evaluate IOP in eyes with out-of-range corneal thickness.
METHODS: GAT and DCT were performed in 70 eyes of 35 subjects aged between 21 and 59 years. Thirty eyes had normal, nonoperated corneas and 40 eyes had reduced central corneal thickness (CCT) following myopic photorefractive keratectomy. The GAT and DCT values were correlated to CCT and age and the agreement between both tonometers was determined by the Bland and Altman method.
RESULTS: GAT correlated strongly with CCT (p = 0.0002), but there was no correlation between DCT and CCT (p = 0.4388). No correlation was found between IOP values obtained with both devices and age. The Bland and Altman plot evidenced a lack of agreement between both tonometers with 95% limits of agreement between 1.6 and -5.6 mm Hg.
CONCLUSIONS: GAT gives significantly lower values in the eyes with thin corneas and DCT is not influenced by CCT. DCT could be recommended to evaluate IOP in eyes with out-of-range corneal thickness.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app