How often we need to measure brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) blood levels in patients admitted to the hospital for acute severe heart failure? Role of serial measurements to improve short-term prognostic stratification.

BACKGROUND: Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) is increasingly used in the management of patients with heart failure (HF). It is still unclear how to use serial BNP measurement in HF.

AIM: To evaluate the usefulness of three consecutive measurements of BNP in patients (pts) hospitalized for acute HF.

METHODS: Clinical evaluation, BNP levels and echocardiography were assessed in 150 pts (67% males, age: 69+/-12 years; left ventricular ejection fraction: 34+/-14%) admitted for severe HF (NYHA class III-IV: 146/150). BNP measurements were obtained: at admission (basal, T0), at discharge (T1) and at first ambulatory control (T2), after optimization of medical therapy in those with discharge BNP level >250 pg/mL. End-points were death and hospital readmission during 6-month follow-up.

RESULTS: According to BNP levels 3 groups of patients were identified: Group 1 (62 pts, 41%), in whom discharge (T1) BNP was high and persisted elevated at T2 despite aggressive medical therapy; at 6-month follow-up 72% died or were hospitalized for HF. Group 2 (36 pts, 24%), in whom discharge (T1) BNP was high but decreased after medical therapy (T2); death and HF-readmission were observed in 8 pts (26%). Group 3 (52 pts, 35%), in whom discharge (T1) BNP levels were <250 pg/mL and persisted below this value at T2; death and HF-hospital readmission were observed in 6 pts (12%). Event rate differences among groups were statistically significant (p<0.001). At Cox-analysis discharge BNP cutoff of 250 pg/mL was the only parameter predictive of a worse outcome.

CONCLUSION: These data suggest that 3 BNP measurements, at admission, at discharge and few weeks later can allow to identify HF pts whom, despite a further potentiation of medical therapy, will present a worsening or even will die during short-term follow-up.