JOURNAL ARTICLE

Guide to the assessment of competence and performance in practising surgeons

Ian Dickinson, David Watters, Ian Graham, Pam Montgomery, John Collins
ANZ Journal of Surgery 2009, 79 (3): 198-204
19317789
Surgical performance is increasingly under public scrutiny and non-technical behavioural issues are more frequently the focus of complaints. Currently, there is a lack of a suitable framework or template to assist surgeons in the assessment of their own performance or that of their colleagues. A Royal Australasian College of Surgeons (RACS) Working Party considered the methods currently available to define and assess surgical performance. The scope included assessment tools, resources available, and support for surgeons. The Non-Technical Skills for Surgeons (NOTSS) programme developed by the Royal College of Surgeons, Edinburgh and the School of Psychology, University of Aberdeen was of particular interest. This programme was reviewed, adapted and expanded. The nine RACS competencies were used as the foundation for developing a set of three behavioural patterns within each competency domain. Each behavioural pattern was then described by a set of eight behavioural markers--describing four good and four poor behaviours. A variety of resources were identified to assist surgeons, including College and other similar courses and guidelines, publications covering professionalism and health issues and support through various agencies. It was recognized that the College has a role to support its Fellows and to ensure any review of performance is conducted impartially, competently and confidentially. The resulting guide was approved by College Council in June 2008 and later distributed to Fellows and hospitals throughout Australia and New Zealand. It is intended to be used for self-reflection and self-assessment, although it could equally be used as a template for the review of an individual surgeon's performance by a clinical director of surgery or other agency. Considerable progress has been made in the assessment of performance of practising surgeons. This guide has been published to address performance issues across all RACS competencies. It also outlines a variety of assessment methods and strategies to support surgeons.

Full Text Links

Find Full Text Links for this Article

Discussion

You are not logged in. Sign Up or Log In to join the discussion.

Trending Papers

Remove bar
Read by QxMD icon Read
19317789
×

Search Tips

Use Boolean operators: AND/OR

diabetic AND foot
diabetes OR diabetic

Exclude a word using the 'minus' sign

Virchow -triad

Use Parentheses

water AND (cup OR glass)

Add an asterisk (*) at end of a word to include word stems

Neuro* will search for Neurology, Neuroscientist, Neurological, and so on

Use quotes to search for an exact phrase

"primary prevention of cancer"
(heart or cardiac or cardio*) AND arrest -"American Heart Association"