We have located links that may give you full text access.
Accuracy of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide in the identification of left ventricular dysfunction in high-risk asymptomatic patients.
Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine 2009 March
OBJECTIVE: The role of natriuretic peptides in the screening of left ventricular dysfunction is still unclear. The aim of this study was to assess the usefulness of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) measurement in asymptomatic patients at high risk of developing left ventricular dysfunction.
METHODS: One hundred and thirty-four consecutive ambulatory patients (mean age 56.1 +/- 7 years) were studied and selected on the basis of a history of hypertension of at least 5 years. Systolic dysfunction was defined as an ejection fraction of 45% or less. Statistical analysis was performed by both parametric and nonparametric approaches. Diagnostic accuracy was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic analysis.
RESULTS: Echocardiography showed normal left ventricular function in 40 patients, diastolic dysfunction in 80 patients and systolic dysfunction in 14 patients. NT-proBNP levels were significantly higher in patients with systolic dysfunction (356.1 +/- 294.8 vs. 85.2 +/- 85.8 pg/ml; P < 0.05). Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed a high value of the area under the curve (0.89) for the detection of systolic dysfunction with a sensitivity of 83% and a specificity of 80% for a cut-off value of 114 pg/ml and with a negative predictive value of 0.98.
CONCLUSION: In asymptomatic patients at high risk for heart failure because of a history of hypertension, the measurement of NT-proBNP levels may represent a useful screening test for left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Therefore, more expensive examinations, such as echocardiography, may be restricted only to patients with higher NT-proBNP levels.
METHODS: One hundred and thirty-four consecutive ambulatory patients (mean age 56.1 +/- 7 years) were studied and selected on the basis of a history of hypertension of at least 5 years. Systolic dysfunction was defined as an ejection fraction of 45% or less. Statistical analysis was performed by both parametric and nonparametric approaches. Diagnostic accuracy was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic analysis.
RESULTS: Echocardiography showed normal left ventricular function in 40 patients, diastolic dysfunction in 80 patients and systolic dysfunction in 14 patients. NT-proBNP levels were significantly higher in patients with systolic dysfunction (356.1 +/- 294.8 vs. 85.2 +/- 85.8 pg/ml; P < 0.05). Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed a high value of the area under the curve (0.89) for the detection of systolic dysfunction with a sensitivity of 83% and a specificity of 80% for a cut-off value of 114 pg/ml and with a negative predictive value of 0.98.
CONCLUSION: In asymptomatic patients at high risk for heart failure because of a history of hypertension, the measurement of NT-proBNP levels may represent a useful screening test for left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Therefore, more expensive examinations, such as echocardiography, may be restricted only to patients with higher NT-proBNP levels.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app