We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Anatomic location and histopathologic subtype of basal cell carcinomas in adults younger than 40 or 90 and older: any difference?
Dermatologic Surgery : Official Publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et Al.] 2009 Februrary
BACKGROUND: Differences in age, site, and histopathologic subtype exist in basal cell carcinoma (BCC).
OBJECTIVE: To compare the distribution of BCCs in patients younger than 40 with that of those aged 90 and older according to sex, site, and subtype.
METHODS & MATERIALS: One hundred seventy-five BCCs were examined. The site was classified as head and neck, trunk, or limbs and the subtype as nodular, superficial, or morpheic-infiltrative.
RESULTS: Younger exhibited a lower prevalence of BCCs on the head and neck (36.0% vs 57.3%, p<.01) and a higher prevalence on the trunk (59.3% vs 31.5%, p<.01) and of superficial BCCs (43.0% vs 31.5%, p<.05) than older patients. Site was associated with subtype in younger (p<.001) and older (p=.004) patients. Superficial BCCs were mostly on the trunk (p<.001), with a higher prevalence in younger patients (86.5% vs 62.5%, p<.05). Morpheic BCCs were mostly on the head and neck (p<.001), and prevalence did not differ between age groups. Nodular BCCs were mostly on the head and neck in older patients (p=.011). Subtype was independently associated with site (p=.005) but not with age or sex.
CONCLUSION: A different distribution of site and subtype occurs in younger and older patients. Subtype is associated with site independent of age and sex. These findings suggest that, at least in some patients, the anatomic location of BCC may favor the development of a particular subtype.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the distribution of BCCs in patients younger than 40 with that of those aged 90 and older according to sex, site, and subtype.
METHODS & MATERIALS: One hundred seventy-five BCCs were examined. The site was classified as head and neck, trunk, or limbs and the subtype as nodular, superficial, or morpheic-infiltrative.
RESULTS: Younger exhibited a lower prevalence of BCCs on the head and neck (36.0% vs 57.3%, p<.01) and a higher prevalence on the trunk (59.3% vs 31.5%, p<.01) and of superficial BCCs (43.0% vs 31.5%, p<.05) than older patients. Site was associated with subtype in younger (p<.001) and older (p=.004) patients. Superficial BCCs were mostly on the trunk (p<.001), with a higher prevalence in younger patients (86.5% vs 62.5%, p<.05). Morpheic BCCs were mostly on the head and neck (p<.001), and prevalence did not differ between age groups. Nodular BCCs were mostly on the head and neck in older patients (p=.011). Subtype was independently associated with site (p=.005) but not with age or sex.
CONCLUSION: A different distribution of site and subtype occurs in younger and older patients. Subtype is associated with site independent of age and sex. These findings suggest that, at least in some patients, the anatomic location of BCC may favor the development of a particular subtype.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app