Clinical Trial
Comparative Study
English Abstract
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

[Comparative study for the treatment of erectile dysfunction with sildenafil and vardenafil--multi-centric research in Nagano City].

OBJECTIVE: The efficacy and safety of two types of phoshodiestrase type 5 ( PDE 5) inhibitors (sildenafil (sil) and vardenafil (var)) were investigated for multi-centric study.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS: One hundred and twenty five patients (55.9 +/- 10.9 years old) with erectile dysfunction (ED) were treated by both of sil and var. The patients were administered a pair of 25 mg of sil and 5 mg of var, or 50 mg of sil and 10 mg of var. The efficacy for ED and safety of these 2 drugs were evaluated after administration of each drugs at least 2 times.

RESULTS: The results showed that the score of international index of erectile function 5 (IIEF5) were elevated from 8.87 +/- 4.10 to 17.24 +/- 6.17 after treatments (p< 0.0001, Student' s t test). The efficacy rates for ED were 81.6% in sil and 81.6% in var, respectively. The adverse reactions rates such as headache, burning, palpitation, etc. were 13.6% in sil and 5.6% in var, which is significantly higher in sil (p = 0.032; chi2 test). These side effects were not serious at all, and there were no cases that gave up to use PDE5 inhibitors because of adverse reactions. According to individual patients experiences, 40.7% of patients preferred sil, 45.4% choose var. In addition, associated effects for quality of life (QOL) of ED patients treated by PDE5 inhibitors were analyzed. The results revealed that encouraging in life 46.5%, rejuvenation feeling 45.1%, self care for their health 28.2%, improvement of depression 12.7%, improvement of voiding dysfunction 5.6%, intimacy with partner 38.0%, good conversation with partner 18.3%, and so on.

CONCLUSION: The treatments of ED by sil and var were very effective and safety. Furthermore, associated effects for QOL of ED patients were also improved with these treatments.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app