JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

A retrospective analysis of biofilm antibiotic susceptibility testing: a better predictor of clinical response in cystic fibrosis exacerbations.

BACKGROUND: Bacteria grow as biofilms within CF airways. However, antibiotic susceptibility testing is routinely performed on planktonically-growing bacteria. This study assessed whether CF patients infected with multiresistant organisms had improved clinical outcomes if given antibiotics that inhibited their biofilm-grown bacteria.

METHODS: 110 patients with pulmonary exacerbations were treated with intravenous antibiotics based on susceptibility testing of planktonically-growing bacteria. A retrospective analysis was done using bacterial isolates grown from their sputum at exacerbation. Each isolate was grown as a biofilm and combination antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed. Clinical outcomes in patients treated with biofilm-susceptible antibiotics were compared to those that were not.

RESULTS: 66 of 110 patients (60%) were treated with antibiotic combinations that inhibited all of their planktonically-grown bacterial isolates, however, when the same isolates were grown as biofilms, only 24 patients (22%) had all of their biofilm-grown isolates remaining susceptible to the antibiotics (P=<0.001 ). When patients with at least one biofilm-grown susceptible isolate (n=61) were compared to those with none (n=49), there was a significant decrease in sputum bacterial density (P=0.02) and length of stay (P=0.04) and a non-significant decrease in treatment failure. Survival analyses of time to next exacerbation showed non-significant trends favoring patients treated with biofilm-effective antibiotics.

CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with CF exacerbations do not receive antibiotics that inhibit all biofilm-grown bacteria from their sputum at exacerbation. Patients treated with biofilm-effective therapy seemed to have improved clinical outcomes.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app