We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Long-term rates of cardiovascular events in patients with the metabolic syndrome according to severity of coronary-angiographic alterations.
Coronary Artery Disease 2009 January
OBJECTIVES: To assess the long-term risk of mortality and cardiovascular events, related to metabolic syndrome (MetS), in patients with less, or more severe coronary artery disease (CAD).
METHODS: One thousand and eighty patients were divided in four groups, according to severity of CAD (1=less than 50% or nonsignificant stenoses; 2=greater or significant stenoses), and according to MetS (A=no; B=yes). Risk was evaluated with the Cox regression analysis.
RESULTS: About 18.9% of patients had less and 81.1% more advanced CAD. MetS was present in 45.1% of the first, and in 52.9% of the second group. At baseline, patients with MetS, or significant stenoses, had less favorable medical, biochemical, and angiographic characteristics. During a follow-up of 12.6+/-3.4 years, group 1B had higher incidence (16.3 vs. 7.1%) and hazard ratio [2.36 (1.001-5.57; P=0.0497)] of myocardial infarction than group 1A; group 2B had a higher incidence (19.0 vs. 11.7%) and hazard ratio [1.67 (1.18-2.37; P=0.0041)] of stroke than group 2A. Groups 2A and 2B, as compared with groups 1A and 1B, had a higher incidence of myocardial infarction (39.1 vs. 7.1; 41.8 vs. 16.3%); group 2B had higher incidence of stroke than group 1B (19.0 vs. 9.8%). After adjustment for common risk factors, group 2B retained an elevated risk of stroke. After additional adjustment for diabetes, no event was significantly related to MetS.
CONCLUSION: At baseline, coronary patients with MetS, or significant angiographic alterations, had more cardiovascular risk factors. During follow-up, both MetS and significant CAD increased the risk of cardiovascular morbidity but not of mortality.
METHODS: One thousand and eighty patients were divided in four groups, according to severity of CAD (1=less than 50% or nonsignificant stenoses; 2=greater or significant stenoses), and according to MetS (A=no; B=yes). Risk was evaluated with the Cox regression analysis.
RESULTS: About 18.9% of patients had less and 81.1% more advanced CAD. MetS was present in 45.1% of the first, and in 52.9% of the second group. At baseline, patients with MetS, or significant stenoses, had less favorable medical, biochemical, and angiographic characteristics. During a follow-up of 12.6+/-3.4 years, group 1B had higher incidence (16.3 vs. 7.1%) and hazard ratio [2.36 (1.001-5.57; P=0.0497)] of myocardial infarction than group 1A; group 2B had a higher incidence (19.0 vs. 11.7%) and hazard ratio [1.67 (1.18-2.37; P=0.0041)] of stroke than group 2A. Groups 2A and 2B, as compared with groups 1A and 1B, had a higher incidence of myocardial infarction (39.1 vs. 7.1; 41.8 vs. 16.3%); group 2B had higher incidence of stroke than group 1B (19.0 vs. 9.8%). After adjustment for common risk factors, group 2B retained an elevated risk of stroke. After additional adjustment for diabetes, no event was significantly related to MetS.
CONCLUSION: At baseline, coronary patients with MetS, or significant angiographic alterations, had more cardiovascular risk factors. During follow-up, both MetS and significant CAD increased the risk of cardiovascular morbidity but not of mortality.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app