We have located links that may give you full text access.
Role of iNOS in bystander signaling between macrophages and lymphoma cells.
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics 2008 December 2
PURPOSE: The present report describes the bystander effects of radiation between similar and dissimilar cells and the role of iNOS in such communication.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: EL-4 and RAW 264.7 cells were exposed to 5 Gy gamma-irradiation. The medium from irradiated cells was transferred to unirradiated cells.
RESULTS: Irradiated EL-4 cells as well as those cultured in the presence of medium from gamma-irradiated EL-4 cells showed an upregulation of NF-kappaB, iNOS, p53, and p21/waf1 genes. The directly irradiated and the bystander EL-4 cells showed an increase in DNA damage, apoptosis, and NO production. Bystander signaling was also found to exist between RAW 264.7 (macrophage) and EL-4 (lymphoma) cells. Unstimulated or irradiated RAW 264.7 cells did not induce bystander effect in unirradiated EL-4 cells, but LPS stimulated and irradiated RAW 264.7 cells induced an upregulation of NF-kappaB and iNOS genes and increased the DNA damage in bystander EL-4 cells. Treatment of EL-4 or RAW 264.7 cells with L-NAME significantly reduced the induction of gene expression and DNA damage in the bystander EL-4 cells, whereas treatment with cPTIO only partially reduced the induction of gene expression and DNA damage in the bystander EL-4 cells.
CONCLUSIONS: It was concluded that active iNOS in the irradiated cells was essential for bystander response.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: EL-4 and RAW 264.7 cells were exposed to 5 Gy gamma-irradiation. The medium from irradiated cells was transferred to unirradiated cells.
RESULTS: Irradiated EL-4 cells as well as those cultured in the presence of medium from gamma-irradiated EL-4 cells showed an upregulation of NF-kappaB, iNOS, p53, and p21/waf1 genes. The directly irradiated and the bystander EL-4 cells showed an increase in DNA damage, apoptosis, and NO production. Bystander signaling was also found to exist between RAW 264.7 (macrophage) and EL-4 (lymphoma) cells. Unstimulated or irradiated RAW 264.7 cells did not induce bystander effect in unirradiated EL-4 cells, but LPS stimulated and irradiated RAW 264.7 cells induced an upregulation of NF-kappaB and iNOS genes and increased the DNA damage in bystander EL-4 cells. Treatment of EL-4 or RAW 264.7 cells with L-NAME significantly reduced the induction of gene expression and DNA damage in the bystander EL-4 cells, whereas treatment with cPTIO only partially reduced the induction of gene expression and DNA damage in the bystander EL-4 cells.
CONCLUSIONS: It was concluded that active iNOS in the irradiated cells was essential for bystander response.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app