Comparative Study
Journal Article
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Modified irinotecan plus bolus 5-fluorouracil/L-leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer at a single institution in Japan.

BACKGROUND: The modified irinotecan plus bolus 5-fluorouracil/L-leucovorin (IFL) regimen (irinotecan plus bolus 5-fluorouracil/L-leucovorin) used to be one of the standard treatments for metastatic colorectal cancer until approval of oxaliplatin in Japan. We evaluated the efficacy of modified IFL therapy for Japanese patients.

METHODS: Forty-seven patients with metastatic colorectal cancer received irinotecan (100 mg/m(2)) and bolus 5-fluorouracil (500 mg/m(2)) plus L-leucovorin (10 mg/m(2)) on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks until progression or unmanageable toxicity occurred. The data on toxicity and tumor response were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS: All patients discontinued modified IFL therapy due to cancer progression, except for one patient who developed severe liver dysfunction. The overall response rate was 25%. The median progression-free survival time (PFS) was 8.6 [corrected] months. The median overall survival time (OS) was 27.8 [corrected] months for all patients, 30.9 [corrected] months for patients receiving subsequent oxaliplatin therapy, and 14.5 [corrected] months for patients without oxaliplatin (P = 0.0031). According to multivariate analysis results, good performance status, a normal white cell count, and absence of local recurrence were associated with a better PFS. Tumor response was a good prognostic factor for both PFS and OS. Gastrointestinal symptoms were the most common toxicities, including grade 3 diarrhea (8%) and grade 3 anorexia (10%). Grade 4 neutropenia occurred in 6% of patients. No other drug-related severe adverse events or deaths were observed.

CONCLUSIONS: Modified IFL therapy is an effective and well-tolerated regimen for Japanese patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Modified IFL therapy combined with biological agents might remain an option for some patients who refuse a central venous catheter.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app