Comparative Study
Evaluation Studies
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography: evaluation of the high relaxivity low diffusible gadolinium-based contrast agent P846 in comparison with gadoterate meglumine in rabbits at 1.5 Tesla and 3.0 Tesla.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the gadolinium-based contrast agent P846 and compare it with gadoterate meglumine (Gd-DOTA) for contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) in rabbits at 1.5 T and 3.0 T, respectively.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five rabbits underwent contrast-enhanced MRA of the abdominal vasculature applying gadolinium doses of 0.025 mmoL/kg for P846 and 0.1 mmoL/kg for Gd-DOTA, respectively. All animals were examined on a 1.5-T and 3.0-T MR system. Image data were acquired during the first-pass arterial phase and repeatedly over 10 minutes. Contrast-to-noise-ratio (CNR) was determined in the aorta, the inferior vena cava, and the renal cortex. Image quality of arterial phase MR angiograms was consensually judged on a 5-point scale (5 = high).

RESULTS: Contrast-enhanced MRA was successful in all cases with both contrast agents. CNR values consistently proved statistically significantly higher for P846 compared with Gd-DOTA. CNR values in the aorta during the arterial phase were 46.0 +/- 3.7 (P846) and 28.0 +/- 3.2 (Gd-DOTA) at 1.5 T (P < 0.05), and correspondingly 89.3 +/- 12.7 (P846) and 64.1 +/- 15.0 (Gd-DOTA) at 3.0 T (P < 0.05). Image quality of arterial phase MR angiograms was rated with scores of 4.8 +/- 0.4 (P846) and 4.0 +/- 0.0 (Gd-DOTA) at 1.5 T (P = 0.06), and 5.0 +/- 0.0 (P846) and 4.8 +/- 0.4 (Gd-DOTA) at 3.0 T (P = 0.42), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS: The contrast agent P846 provides high contrast enhancement and image quality for contrast-enhanced MRA in rabbits at 1.5 T and 3.0 T with a 4-fold lower gadolinium dose compared with a standard extracellular contrast agent.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app