Comparative Study
Journal Article
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Usefulness of multidetector computed tomography for detecting protruding lesions in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas in comparison with single-detector computed tomography and endoscopic ultrasonography.

Pancreas 2009 March
OBJECTIVES: To retrospectively evaluate the usefulness of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) with multiplanar reformations (MPRs) and curved planar reformations (CPRs) for detecting protruding lesions in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas (IPMNs) as compared with single-detector CT (SDCT) and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS).

METHODS: Eighty-six patients with IPMNs were imaged either with SDCT (n = 52) or MDCT with MPRs/CPRs and EUS (n = 34). The diagnostic accuracy of each imaging modality for identifying protruding lesions was compared with histological samples.

RESULTS: Among the patients in whom protruding lesions were histopathologically identified, the lesions were detected in 9 of the 33 patients subjected to SDCT (51.9% accuracy), in 17 of the 25 patients subjected to MDCT with MPRs and CPRs (76.5% accuracy), and in 21 of the 25 patients subjected to EUS (70.6% accuracy). Thus, significant difference was observed between MDCT and SDCT regarding accuracy (P < 0.05); however, no significant difference was seen between MDCT and EUS. Protruding lesions of less than 10 mm in height were better visualized with MDCT (53.3%) than with SDCT (13.0%; P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS: Multidetector computed tomography proved more useful than SDCT and equivalent to EUS in detecting protruding lesions in IPMNs.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app