Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Arthroscopic repair of Palmer 1B triangular fibrocartilage complex tears.

Arthroscopy 2008 November
PURPOSE: The objective of this retrospective study was to determine functional and subjective outcomes of patients with Palmer type 1B tears repaired arthroscopically and to investigate whether clinical outcomes are related to ulna length.

METHODS: Forty-six patients with arthroscopic repair of Palmer type 1B tears were reviewed. There were 23 males and 23 females. The average age was 34 years (range, 10 to 58 yrs). The average follow-up was 11 months (range, 6 to 23 mos), and the delay to surgery was 9.7 months. All patients suffered ulnar-sided wrist pain and were diagnosed with Palmer type 1B tears. The tear was repaired arthroscopically with an inside-outside suture technique. The range of motion (ROM), grip strength, pain, wrist score (modified Mayo wrist score), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire (DASH) score, and ulna length (static and dynamic) were evaluated.

RESULTS: There was a reduction in pain and an improvement in grip strength. Postoperative ROM averaged 128 degrees +/- 23 degrees for the extension/flexion arc, 41 degrees +/- 11 degrees for the radial/ulnar deviation arc, and 171 degrees +/- 19 degrees for the pronation/supination arc of motion. However, no relation could be found between ulna length and clinical outcome. The modified Mayo wrist score was rated excellent in 22% of patients, good in 41%, fair in 27%, and poor in 10%. The average DASH score was 21.70 +/- 17.17 (range, 0 to 58.33).

CONCLUSIONS: Arthroscopic repair of Palmer type 1B tears yields satisfactory results. Sixty-three percent of patients achieved good to excellent results, experienced increased ROM, grip strength, and pain relief. Ulnar neutral or positive variance is not a contraindication for suture repair and does not require simultaneous ulna shortening when repairing the triangular fibrocartilage complex arthroscopically. A delay to surgery did not affect clinical outcome.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app