JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Usefulness of third-line chemotherapy for women with recurrent ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer who receive platinum/taxane regimens as first-line therapy.

BACKGROUND: Limited information is available regarding the usefulness of third-line chemotherapy for recurrent ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer treated with platinum-taxane regimens as first-line therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of women with ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer who were treated at the National Cancer Center Hospital between 1999 and 2005 to investigate the relations of clinicopathological factors to important clinical endpoints such as the response rate (RR), time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) after third-line chemotherapy.

RESULTS: A total of 172 patients received first-line platinum/taxane regimens during the study period, among whom 111 had disease progression after first-line chemotherapy. Eighty-one of these 111 patients received second-line chemotherapy, and 73 had disease progression. Fifty-four of the 73 patients with disease progression received third-line chemotherapy. The RR to third-line chemotherapy was 40.7% (95% CI, 27.6-53.8%). The median TTP was 4.4 months (range 0-19.5 months), and the median OS was 10.4 months (range 1.5-44.3 months). Performance status (PS) and primary drug-free interval (DFI) were independent predictive factors for the RR to third-line chemotherapy (P = 0.04 and P = 0.009). PS and primary DFI were also independent predictive factors for TTP and OS on multivariate analysis (P = 0.006, P = 0.005 and P = 0.01, P = 0.004, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS: PS and primary DFI are useful predictors of the response to third-line chemotherapy in women with recurrent ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer. In this setting, however, both of these variables are subject to several well-established potential biases and limitations; further prospective studies are thus needed.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app