COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Primary syphilis: serological treatment response to doxycycline/tetracycline versus benzathine penicillin.

BACKGROUND: Benzathine penicillin G is the treatment of choice for infectious syphilis, but tetracycline and doxycycline are believed to be effective second-line treatments. The objective of this study was to assess the serological response from treatment of primary syphilis with benzathine penicillin compared with doxycycline or tetracycline.

METHODS: We examined rapid plasma reagin serological test results of all first-time primary syphilis patients in Alberta, Canada from 1980 to 2001 and compared treatment with single dose of penicillin with 14-day course of oral doxycycline (100 mg twice a day) or oral tetracycline (500 mg 4 times a day). Serological treatment success was defined as a minimum 4-fold decrease in baseline rapid plasma reagin test antibody titer within 6 months, or > or =8-fold decrease within 12 months, or > or =16-fold decrease by 24 months. The median time to successful response was estimated, and factors associated with treatment success were identified by unadjusted logistic regression.

RESULTS: Of the 445 primary syphilis cases with available treatment outcome data, 420 (94.4%) received penicillin and 25 (5.6%) received doxycycline/tetracycline. The serological treatment success rate was 97.4% in the penicillin group (409/420) and 100% in the doxycycline/tetracycline group (25/25), and not significantly different. The estimated median time to serological treatment success was 72.0 days (mean=101.7, range 10-603) in penicillin and 43.0 days (mean=78.6, range 15-334) in doxycycline/tetracycline-treated patients; however, this difference was not statistically significant (P=0.16).

CONCLUSION: Doxycycline/tetracycline had a similarly high serological treatment success rate when compared with penicillin in the treatment of primary syphilis.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app