CLINICAL TRIAL
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
VALIDATION STUDIES
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Assessment of systemic-pulmonary collateral arteries in children with cyanotic congenital heart disease using multidetector-row computed tomography: comparison with conventional angiography.

BACKGROUND: The present study aimed to assess the feasibility of multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) for the evaluation of systemic-pulmonary collateral (SPC) arteries in children with congenital heart disease associated with reduced pulmonary blood flow.

METHODS: Forty-eight consecutive patients (mean age 9+/-5 months; range, 0-30 months) underwent MDCT angiography of the thorax with a 16-detector row scanner prior to cardiac catheterization and operation. Conventional angiographic findings were used as a gold standard for the detection of SPC vessels. Findings on CT angiograms, including CT scans, maximum intensity projections, and three-dimensional volume-rendered images, were used to evaluate depiction of SPC arteries. Quantification of measurements at the SPC artery diameter was evaluated independently on MDCT and conventional invasive angiography.

RESULTS: Among the 48 patients, 115 SPC arteries were identified with conventional angiography, and 94 SPC arteries were identified with MDCT. In 89 (77%) vessels, concordant findings were observed with both modalities, with adequate depiction in 53 vessels and suboptimal depiction in 36 vessels. In 26 (23%) vessels, MDCT was unable to identify SPC arteries. Further, CT angiography resulted in the false-positive identification of vessels in 5 cases. There was an excellent correlation between MDCT- and conventional angiography-based measurement of SPC vessel diameter (R(2)=0.83), although a systematic overestimation was observed with MDCT (bias 0.19+/-0.74 mm).

CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that MDCT is a potentially useful tool, which may have implications for planning percutaneous interventions and surgical repair in the future.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app