JOURNAL ARTICLE

Accuracy and reproducibility of quantitation of left ventricular function by real-time three-dimensional echocardiography versus cardiac magnetic resonance

Osama I I Soliman, Sharon W Kirschbaum, Bas M van Dalen, Heleen B van der Zwaan, Babak Mahdavian Delavary, Wim B Vletter, Robert-Jan M van Geuns, Folkert J Ten Cate, Marcel L Geleijnse
American Journal of Cardiology 2008 September 15, 102 (6): 778-83
18774006
The aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy and reproducibility of the quantification of left ventricular (LV) function by real-time 3-dimensional echocardiography (RT3DE) using current state-of-the-art hardware and software. Compared with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), previous generations of hardware and software for RT3DE significantly underestimated LV volumes partly because of inherent factors such as limited spatial and temporal resolution. Also, RT3DE volumes were compared with short-axis CMR data, whereas a combined short-axis and long-axis analysis is known to be superior. Twenty-four subjects (mean age 51 +/- 12 years, 17 men) in sinus rhythm and with good to excellent 2-dimensional image quality underwent RT3DE and CMR within 1 day. The acquisition of RT3DE data was done with current state-of-the-art hardware and software. Two blinded experts performed off-line LV volume analysis. Global LV volumes were determined from semiautomated border detection on the basis of endocardial speckle tracking with biplane projections using QLAB version 6.0. Volumes derived by magnetic resonance imaging were quantified from combined short-axis and long-axis series. The volume-rate on RT3DE was 33 +/- 8 Hz (range 19 to 42). Excellent correlations were found (R2 > or = 0.97) between CMR and RT3DE for global LV end-diastolic volume, LV end-systolic volume, the LV ejection fraction, and LV phase volumes (24 phases/cardiac cycle). Bland-Altman analyses showed mean differences of -7.1 ml, -4.2 ml, 0.2%, and -5.8 ml and 95% limits of agreement of +/-19.7 ml, +/-8.3 ml, +/-6.2%, and +/-15.4 ml for global LV end-diastolic volume, LV end-systolic volume, the LV ejection fraction, and LV phase volumes, respectively. Interobserver variability was 5.2% for global LV end-diastolic volume, 6.4% for LV end-systolic volume, and 7.6% for the LV ejection fraction. In conclusion, in patients with good acoustic windows, RT3DE using state-of-the-art technology provides accurate and reproducible measurements of global LV volumes, LV volume changes over time, and the LV ejection fraction.

Full Text Links

Find Full Text Links for this Article

Discussion

You are not logged in. Sign Up or Log In to join the discussion.

Related Papers

Remove bar
Read by QxMD icon Read
18774006
×

Save your favorite articles in one place with a free QxMD account.

×

Search Tips

Use Boolean operators: AND/OR

diabetic AND foot
diabetes OR diabetic

Exclude a word using the 'minus' sign

Virchow -triad

Use Parentheses

water AND (cup OR glass)

Add an asterisk (*) at end of a word to include word stems

Neuro* will search for Neurology, Neuroscientist, Neurological, and so on

Use quotes to search for an exact phrase

"primary prevention of cancer"
(heart or cardiac or cardio*) AND arrest -"American Heart Association"