JOURNAL ARTICLE
Perifollicular xanthomatosis as the hallmark of axillary Fox-Fordyce disease: an evaluation of histopathologic features of 7 cases.
Archives of Dermatology 2008 August
BACKGROUND: Fox-Fordyce disease (FFD) or apocrine miliaria is a rare condition with features that are characteristic clinically but not histopathologically. It is traditionally described as a condition that shows infundibular plugging, acanthosis, parakeratosis, spongiosis, and a nonspecific infiltrate. The so-called retention vesicle, which reputedly involves the apocrine duct, is often difficult to find. Recently, 4 uncontrolled observations were described (infundibular dyskeratotic cells, vacuolar alteration, cornoid lamella-like parakeratosis, and perifollicular foamy macrophages). In this study, we evaluated both established and new histopathologic criteria for the diagnosis of FFD and searched for other meaningful findings.
OBSERVATIONS: Most established features were observed in both patients with FFD and control patients. All cases occurred during 1995 through 2005. No unequivocal retention vesicle was identifiable in any case. Infundibular vacuolar change and cornoid lamella-like parakeratosis were not corroborated as being diagnostically meaningful. Few dyskeratotic cells were seen in some patients with FFD and in control patients. Perifollicular foam cells were noted in most patients with FFD but not among control patients. These cells expressed CD68 but lacked expression of carcinoembryonic antigen, gross cystic disease fluid protein 15, and periodic acid-Schiff with diastase digestion. Perifollicular mucin, fibrosis, and mast cells in the infiltrate were also observed.
CONCLUSIONS: The established histopathologic attributes of FFD are nonspecific, and a retention vesicle is difficult to find even in level sections. In contrast, perifollicular foam cells are a distinct, relatively consistent, and specific feature of FFD. We contend that perifollicular foam cells represent a useful hallmark of FFD.
OBSERVATIONS: Most established features were observed in both patients with FFD and control patients. All cases occurred during 1995 through 2005. No unequivocal retention vesicle was identifiable in any case. Infundibular vacuolar change and cornoid lamella-like parakeratosis were not corroborated as being diagnostically meaningful. Few dyskeratotic cells were seen in some patients with FFD and in control patients. Perifollicular foam cells were noted in most patients with FFD but not among control patients. These cells expressed CD68 but lacked expression of carcinoembryonic antigen, gross cystic disease fluid protein 15, and periodic acid-Schiff with diastase digestion. Perifollicular mucin, fibrosis, and mast cells in the infiltrate were also observed.
CONCLUSIONS: The established histopathologic attributes of FFD are nonspecific, and a retention vesicle is difficult to find even in level sections. In contrast, perifollicular foam cells are a distinct, relatively consistent, and specific feature of FFD. We contend that perifollicular foam cells represent a useful hallmark of FFD.
Full text links
Trending Papers
Oral Anticoagulation in Patients with Chronic Liver Disease.Medicina 2023 Februrary 13
Hashimoto's Encephalopathy: Case Series and Literature Review.Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports 2023 Februrary 29
Sepsis-associated acute kidney injury: consensus report of the 28th Acute Disease Quality Initiative workgroup.Nature Reviews. Nephrology 2023 Februrary 24
BTS clinical statement on aspiration pneumonia.Thorax 2023 Februrary
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
Read by QxMD is copyright © 2021 QxMD Software Inc. All rights reserved. By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app