We have located links that may give you full text access.
A national survey of obstetric anaesthesia guidelines in the UK.
International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia 2008 October
BACKGROUND: In May 2005 the Obstetric Anaesthetists' Association (OAA) and Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland published a document entitled Guidelines for Obstetric Anaesthetic Services. This survey investigated if standards recommended in this document were being met more than six months after its release.
METHODS: An OAA-approved questionnaire was sent to all obstetric anaesthesia lead clinicians across the UK, using the OAA mailing database. Standards investigated were those in relation to anaesthesia for caesarean section and postnatal audit programmes. The availability of 14 recommended clinical guidelines within departments of obstetric anaesthesia was also investigated.
RESULTS: The response rate for the national survey was 79.3%. Not all departments met the standards set out in the guidelines for anaesthesia for caesarean section with only 61.2% of obstetric units having consultant-led elective lists carried out independently of emergency procedures. Eighty percent of units surveyed had postnatal audit programmes in place but only 58.8% generated a regular report from such programmes. The clinical guidelines recommended for obstetric departments were available to varying degrees. Guidelines for haemorrhage, preeclampsia and difficult/failed intubation were available in all units but only 34.6% of units had all 14 recommended guidelines available.
DISCUSSION: This national survey illustrates to what extent UK departments meet national guidelines for provision of obstetric anaesthesia services. It also highlights areas for improvement nationally and could be used by individual units to plan resources in the future.
METHODS: An OAA-approved questionnaire was sent to all obstetric anaesthesia lead clinicians across the UK, using the OAA mailing database. Standards investigated were those in relation to anaesthesia for caesarean section and postnatal audit programmes. The availability of 14 recommended clinical guidelines within departments of obstetric anaesthesia was also investigated.
RESULTS: The response rate for the national survey was 79.3%. Not all departments met the standards set out in the guidelines for anaesthesia for caesarean section with only 61.2% of obstetric units having consultant-led elective lists carried out independently of emergency procedures. Eighty percent of units surveyed had postnatal audit programmes in place but only 58.8% generated a regular report from such programmes. The clinical guidelines recommended for obstetric departments were available to varying degrees. Guidelines for haemorrhage, preeclampsia and difficult/failed intubation were available in all units but only 34.6% of units had all 14 recommended guidelines available.
DISCUSSION: This national survey illustrates to what extent UK departments meet national guidelines for provision of obstetric anaesthesia services. It also highlights areas for improvement nationally and could be used by individual units to plan resources in the future.
Full text links
Trending Papers
A Personalized Approach to the Management of Congestion in Acute Heart Failure.Heart International 2023
Potential Mechanisms of the Protective Effects of the Cardiometabolic Drugs Type-2 Sodium-Glucose Transporter Inhibitors and Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Heart Failure.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 Februrary 21
2024 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway for Treatment of Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Solution Set Oversight Committee.Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2024 March 3
The Effect of Albumin Administration in Critically Ill Patients: A Retrospective Single-Center Analysis.Critical Care Medicine 2024 Februrary 8
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app