OPEN IN READ APP
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Impaired plasma B-type natriuretic peptide clearance in human septic shock

Romain Pirracchio, Nicolas Deye, Anne Claire Lukaszewicz, Alexandre Mebazaa, Bernard Cholley, Joaquim Matéo, Bruno Mégarbane, Jean Marie Launay, Jacqueline Peynet, Frédéric Baud, Didier Payen
Critical Care Medicine 2008, 36 (9): 2542-6
18679125

INTRODUCTION: High B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels are reported in the context of septic shock. We hypothesized that high BNP levels might be related to an alteration in BNP clearance pathway, namely neutral endopeptidase (NEP) 24.11. NEP 24.11 activity was measured in septic shock and in cardiogenic shock patients. We further evaluated whether baseline plasma BNP can predict fluid responsiveness and whether BNP can still be released in plasma despite high initial BNP levels, in response to overloading.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective observational study. Patients in severe sepsis (S) or in septic shock (SS) needing a fluid challenge were included. Stroke volume (SV) and BNP were measured before (SV1, BNP1) and 45 mins after (SV2, BNP2) a standardized fluid challenge. DeltaBNP was defined as the difference between BNP2 and BNP1. NEP 24.11 activity was determined by fluorometry in 12 SS and 4 S patients before fluid challenge and in 5 cardiogenic shock patients.

RESULTS: Twenty-three patients (61 +/- 18 years old, Simplified Acute Physiology Score II: 54 +/- 21; 19 SS, 4 S; BNP1: 1371 +/- 1434 pg/mL) were studied. BNP1 concentrations were significantly higher in SS than in S (1643 +/- 1437 vs. 80 +/- 35 pg/mL; p = 0.002). There was no correlation between baseline BNP and fluid responsiveness. Nine of the 11 patients with BNP1 >1000 pg/mL were fluid responders. DeltaBNP was greater in fluid nonresponders than in fluid responders (22 +/- 27% vs. 6 +/- 11%, p = 0.028). Plasma BNP was higher in SS than in cardiogenic shock patients (1367 +/- 1438 vs. 750 +/- 346 respectively; p = 0.027). NEP 24.11 activity was lower in SS than in S patients (0.10 +/- 0.06 nmole/mL/min vs. 0.50 +/- 0.22 nmole/mL/min, p <0.0001) cardiogenic shock patients (0.10 +/- 0.06 nmole/mL/min vs. 0.58 +/- 0.19 nmole/mL/min; p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION: High levels of BNP might be related to an alteration in BNP clearance. During sepsis, high BNP levels are not predictive of fluid nonresponsiveness. Nevertheless, in fluid nonresponders, acute ventricular stretching can result in further BNP release.

Comments

You need to log in or sign up for an account to be able to comment.

No comments yet, be the first to post one!

Related Papers

Available on the App Store

Available on the Play Store
Remove bar
Read by QxMD icon Read
18679125
×

Search Tips

Use Boolean operators: AND/OR

diabetic AND foot
diabetes OR diabetic

Exclude a word using the 'minus' sign

Virchow -triad

Use Parentheses

water AND (cup OR glass)

Add an asterisk (*) at end of a word to include word stems

Neuro* will search for Neurology, Neuroscientist, Neurological, and so on

Use quotes to search for an exact phrase

"primary prevention of cancer"
(heart or cardiac or cardio*) AND arrest -"American Heart Association"