COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Anti-adherence activity and antimicrobial durability of anti-infective-coated catheters against multidrug-resistant bacteria.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the anti-adherence and antimicrobial durability of anti-infective catheters against multidrug-resistant (MDR) Staphylococcus aureus (resistant to vancomycin, rifampicin and methicillin) and MDR Gram-negative bacteria (Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Acinetobacter baumannii/calcoaceticus and Enterobacter agglomerans) that are often associated with catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs).

METHODS: Catheters impregnated with minocycline and rifampicin (M/R) or with silver-platinum and carbon (SPC) or with chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine (CHX/SS) were compared with non-coated catheters. Adherence of organisms was tested by using an established biofilm colonization model. All isolates were rifampicin-resistant. Antimicrobial durability was tested by soaking 1 cm segments of the catheter in serum and determining zones of inhibition against the tested organisms at weekly intervals.

RESULTS: The M/R catheters showed significantly superior anti-adherence activity and more prolonged antimicrobial durability when compared with CHX/SS-central venous catheter (CVC), SPC-CVC and uncoated control catheters against MDR and vancomycin-resistant S. aureus (MDR VRSA) (all P values < or = 0.02), MDR S. maltophilia (all P values < 0.005) and MDR A. baumannii/calcoaceticus (all P values < 0.002), respectively. M/R-CVC and CHX/SS-CVC had comparable anti-adherence and antimicrobial durability against MDR E. agglomerans, and these two were superior to SPC-CVC and the uncoated control catheters (all P values < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS: M/R-CVC demonstrated superior anti-adherence activity and more prolonged antimicrobial durability when compared with other approved anti-infective catheters against MDR VRSA and/or MDR Gram-negative bacteria that are often associated with CRBSIs. This finding could explain their efficacy and better performance in clinical studies.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app