JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, N.I.H., EXTRAMURAL
RESEARCH SUPPORT, U.S. GOV'T, NON-P.H.S.
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

A computational study of the ground and excited state structure and absorption spectra of free-base N-confused porphine and free-base N-confused tetraphenylporphyrin.

Computational investigations into the ground and singlet excited-state structures and the experimental ground-state absorption spectra of N-confused tetraphenylporphyrin tautomers 1e and 1i and N-confused porphines (NCP) 2e and 2i have been performed. Structural data for the ground state, performed at the B3LYP/6-31G(d), B3LYP/6-31+G(d)//B3LYP/6-31G(d), and B3LYP/6-311+G(d)//B3LYP/6-31G(d) levels, are consistent with those performed at lower levels of theory. Calculations of the gas-phase, ground-state absorption spectrum are qualitatively consistent with condensed phase experiments for predicting the relative intensities of the Q(0,0) and Soret bands. Inclusion of implicit solvation in the calculations substantially improves the correlation of the energy of the Soret band with experiment for both tautomers (1e, 435 nm predicted, 442 nm observed in DMAc; 1i, 435 nm predicted, 437 nm observed in CH2Cl2). The x- and y-polarized Q-band transitions were qualitatively reproduced for 1e in both the gas phase and with solvation, although the low-energy absorption band in 1i was predicted at substantially higher energy (646 nm in the gas phase and 655 nm with solvation) than observed experimentally (724 nm in CH2Cl2). Franck-Condon state and equilibrated singlet excited-state geometries were calculated for unsubstituted NCP tautomers 2e and 2i at the TD-B3LYP/SVP and TD-B3LYP/TZVP//TD-B3LYP/SVP levels. Electronic difference density plots were calculated from these geometries, thereby indicating the change of electron density in the singlet excited states. Adiabatic S1 and S2 geometries of these compounds were also calculated at the TD-B3LYP/SVP level, and the results indicate that while 2i is a more stable ground-state molecule by approximately 7.0 kcal mol-1, the energy difference for the S1 excited states is only approximately 1.0 kcal mol-1 and is 6.1 kcal mol-1 for the S2 excited states.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app