We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Dalteparin versus aspirin in recent-onset branch retinal vein occlusion: a randomized clinical trial.
Archives of Iranian Medicine 2008 July
BACKGROUND: Retinal vein occlusion is the second most common vascular disease of retina after diabetic retinopathy, affecting 1.6% of the population above the age of 40. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of dalteparin and aspirin in patients with recent-onset branch retinal vein occlusion.
METHODS: A randomized clinical trial was conducted on patients with branch retinal vein occlusion of less than 30 days' duration. Ophthalmic, systemic, and hematologic evaluations were made. Visual acuity was measured with Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study chart. Patients in the dalteparin group received subcutaneous dalteparin 100 IU/kg twice daily for 10 days, then 100 IU/kg once daily for another 10 days while the patients in the aspirin group were given aspirin 100 mg daily throughout the study.
RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients were enrolled, 37 in the dalteparin and 41 in the aspirin group. The patients were followed for six months. The visual outcomes of the two groups were compared. Although dalteparin improved mean visual acuity slightly more than aspirin, no statistically significant differences were found between the groups at one (P=0.37), two (P=0.16), three (P=0.11), or six (P=0.13) months. Resolution of macular edema and development of new vessels made no statistically significant difference between the groups [(P=0.08) and (P=0.49), respectively].
CONCLUSION: In recent-onset branch retinal vein occlusion, no significant difference was found in the final visual acuity between the patients treated by dalteparin or aspirin. A further study with larger sample size is recommended.
METHODS: A randomized clinical trial was conducted on patients with branch retinal vein occlusion of less than 30 days' duration. Ophthalmic, systemic, and hematologic evaluations were made. Visual acuity was measured with Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study chart. Patients in the dalteparin group received subcutaneous dalteparin 100 IU/kg twice daily for 10 days, then 100 IU/kg once daily for another 10 days while the patients in the aspirin group were given aspirin 100 mg daily throughout the study.
RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients were enrolled, 37 in the dalteparin and 41 in the aspirin group. The patients were followed for six months. The visual outcomes of the two groups were compared. Although dalteparin improved mean visual acuity slightly more than aspirin, no statistically significant differences were found between the groups at one (P=0.37), two (P=0.16), three (P=0.11), or six (P=0.13) months. Resolution of macular edema and development of new vessels made no statistically significant difference between the groups [(P=0.08) and (P=0.49), respectively].
CONCLUSION: In recent-onset branch retinal vein occlusion, no significant difference was found in the final visual acuity between the patients treated by dalteparin or aspirin. A further study with larger sample size is recommended.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app