COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Immediate results of percutaneous coronary intervention for unprotected left main coronary artery stenoses: transradial versus transfemoral approach

Shu-Kai Hsueh, Yuan-Kai Hsieh, Chiung-Jen Wu, Chih-Yuan Fang, Ali A Youssef, Chien-Jen Chen, Shyh-Ming Chen, Cheng-Hsu Yang, Hon-Kan Yip, Mien-Cheng Chen, Morgan Fu, Cheng-I Cheng
Chang Gung Medical Journal 2008, 31 (2): 190-200
18567420

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of a transradial approach for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is comparable to that of a transfemoral approach. However, few studies have systematically compared the clinical effectiveness of a transradial approach with that of a transfemoral approach for unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) stenoses. We compared success rate, vascular complications and early (in-hospital and six-month) outcomes of transradial PCI for ULMCA stenoses with those of a transfemoral approach.

METHODS: This retrospective study included 131 patients undergoing PCI for ULMCA stenoses between December 2000 and October 2006: 116 (88.5%) patients underwent a transradial approach and fifteen (11.5%) underwent a transfemoral approach.

RESULTS: Both angiographic and procedural success were achieved in 114 (98.3%) patients in the transradial group and fourteen (93.3%) patients in the transfemoral group (p = 0.876). Patients in the transfemoral group required more debulking procedures with large guiding catheters and had larger minimal luminal diameter following PCI than those in the transradial group. Transradial PCI produced fewer in-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (7.8% vs. 33.3%, p = 0.003) and a lower vascular complication rate compared to the transfemoral approach (1.7% vs. 26.6%, p < 0.001). Six-month MACE was lower in the transradial group than the transfemoral group without statistical significance (8.0% vs. 23.1%, p = 0.299).

CONCLUSIONS: A transradial approach for ULMCA diseases produced an equal success rate and a lower vascular complication rate when compared to a transfemoral approach. It should be considered as an acceptable alternative to the transfemoral approach for PCI in ULMCA diseases.

Full Text Links

Find Full Text Links for this Article

Discussion

You are not logged in. Sign Up or Log In to join the discussion.

Related Papers

Remove bar
Read by QxMD icon Read
18567420
×

Save your favorite articles in one place with a free QxMD account.

×

Search Tips

Use Boolean operators: AND/OR

diabetic AND foot
diabetes OR diabetic

Exclude a word using the 'minus' sign

Virchow -triad

Use Parentheses

water AND (cup OR glass)

Add an asterisk (*) at end of a word to include word stems

Neuro* will search for Neurology, Neuroscientist, Neurological, and so on

Use quotes to search for an exact phrase

"primary prevention of cancer"
(heart or cardiac or cardio*) AND arrest -"American Heart Association"