Comparative Study
Journal Article
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

A comparison of the outcome of cemented all-polyethylene and cementless metal-backed acetabular sockets in primary total hip arthroplasty.

We compared, after a 10-year-minimum follow-up, the outcome of 50 cemented all-polyethylene Charnley acetabular sockets with that of 51 cementless metal-backed sockets in 2 comparable cohorts of young patients. Although the revision rate for the cemented and cementless group was 28% and 35%, respectively, the revision rate for aseptic loosening was 28% for the cemented and 12% for the cementless group. The mean polyethylene wear was 0.112 and 0.114 mm/y, respectively, for the 2 groups. Linear osteolysis was observed in 18 of 50 cemented sockets. Expansile osteolysis presented in 10 of 51 cementless sockets and only in one of the cemented sockets. In conclusion, cementless components had more durable fixation than cemented components. However, they presented more aggressive expansile osteolysis caused by the coexistence of polyethylene and metal debris.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app