Evaluation Studies
Journal Article
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Sandwich-style posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Arthroscopy 2008 June
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results of a sandwich-style posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction, namely double-bundle PCL reconstruction with 8 strands of hamstring tendons and remnant preservation.

METHODS: Eighteen cases of isolated chronic PCL rupture were reconstructed arthroscopically with 8 strands of autogenous hamstring tendons by way of 2-bundle and 4-tunnel reconstruction, as well as preservation of the remnant between the 2 reconstructed bundles. Quadruple-stranded semitendinosus tendon was used to reconstruct the anterolateral bundle, and quadruple-stranded gracilis tendon was used to reconstruct the posteromedial bundle. The grafts were fixed with a suspension technique by mini-plates and mini-buttons. The patients were followed up for a minimum of 2 years and evaluated according to the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Lysholm, and Tegner rating scales.

RESULTS: At a minimum of 2 years after surgery, 17 patients (94.4%) had a negative posterior drawer test and 1 had a 1+ posterior drawer test. The mean KT-1000 examination results (MEDmetric, San Diego, CA) changed from 9.3 +/- 1.4 mm preoperatively to 0.7 +/- 0.9 mm postoperatively (P < .001). According to the IKDC knee examination form, the results were graded as normal in 16 patients (88.9%) and nearly normal in 2 (11.1%). The IKDC subjective results increased from 64.1 +/- 3.3 to 95.6 +/- 3.1 (P < .001), and the Lysholm score increased from 58.6 +/- 4.4 to 94.9 +/- 3.6 (P < .001). The mean Tegner score was 7.1 before injury, 5.6 before surgery, and 6.9 at the last follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS: Arthroscopic sandwich-style PCL reconstruction can yield normal results in 88.9% of patients and nearly normal results in 11.1% at a minimum of 2 years.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app