JOURNAL ARTICLE
REVIEW

[Central nervous system neuromodulation for the treatment of epilepsy. II. Mechanisms of action and perspectives]

F Velasco, M Velasco, A L Velasco, L Rocha, J D Carrillo-Ruiz, G Castro, M Cuéllar-Herrera
Neuro-Chirurgie 2008, 54 (3): 428-35
18448132

OBJECTIVES: Review of available evidence of the mechanisms of action underlying the anticonvulsant effect of current applied to various CNS structures.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: Studies were conducted from observations of patients with drug-resistant seizures and treated with neuromodulation. Seizures originated from various cortical areas with secondary generalization or were initially generalized without a focal origin, either clinically or on EEG or SEEG. Intracranial recordings and SEEG were performed using subdural grids or depth electrodes implanted either for recordings or therapeutic deep brain stimulation (DBS). In a group of mesial temporal lobe epilepsy patients investigated with subdural or SEEG electrodes, the epileptogenic focus area was stimulated for 15 days before anterior temporal lobectomy. The surgical specimen was examined using standard and electronic microscopy and autoradiography in order to identify several neurotransmitter receptors. They also were compared to other surgical specimens from epileptic patients who had intracerebral recordings but without stimulation (epileptic controls) and to autopsy specimens from subjects with no history of epilepsy (nonepileptic controls).

RESULTS: High-frequency (HF) stimulation increases the after-discharge threshold of the stimulated site and alters the cycles of potentials evoked by a test stimulation using a paradigm of coupled stimulations. HF stimulation also decreases local cerebral blood flow in the stimulated area as demonstrated on SPECT. Parahippocampal cortex HF stimulation significantly increases the GABAergic benzodiazepine receptor density in the stimulated area. In addition, centromedianum (CM) thalamic nucleus HF stimulation suppresses thalamic and cortical spike-waves, as well as secondary synchronous discharges visible on EEG. Conversely, low-frequency (3-Hz) bilateral CM stimulation induces a typical absence clinically and on EEG.

CONCLUSION: High-frequency stimulation is responsible for an inhibition of local and propagated epileptogenesis. Low-frequency stimulation may trigger or enhance epileptogenesis when applied on epileptogenic regions.

Full Text Links

Find Full Text Links for this Article

Discussion

You are not logged in. Sign Up or Log In to join the discussion.

Related Papers

Remove bar
Read by QxMD icon Read
18448132
×

Save your favorite articles in one place with a free QxMD account.

×

Search Tips

Use Boolean operators: AND/OR

diabetic AND foot
diabetes OR diabetic

Exclude a word using the 'minus' sign

Virchow -triad

Use Parentheses

water AND (cup OR glass)

Add an asterisk (*) at end of a word to include word stems

Neuro* will search for Neurology, Neuroscientist, Neurological, and so on

Use quotes to search for an exact phrase

"primary prevention of cancer"
(heart or cardiac or cardio*) AND arrest -"American Heart Association"