We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Role of whole-body [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) and conventional techniques in the staging of patients with Hodgkin and aggressive non Hodgkin lymphoma.
La Radiologia Medica 2008 June
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) in the staging of Hodgkin's and aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL and NHL), comparing it with conventional diagnostic methods, i.e. contrast-enhanced CT and bone marrow biopsy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-five consecutive patients (30 HL and 35 NHL) who underwent conventional disease staging and FDG-PET/CT were included. Concordance between conventional methods and PET was established when both procedures identified the same disease stage. Discordant findings were investigated further by using other diagnostic techniques (ultrasonography or magnetic resonance imaging) and/or clinical follow-up.
RESULTS: PET correctly staged 93.8% of enrolled patients (61/65), whereas conventional techniques correctly staged 89.2% (58/65; p=NS, Chi(2) test). There was complete concordance in 54/65 patients (83.1%); among the remaining 11 cases, PET upstaged eight patients (seven true positive and one false positive), and downstaged three (all false negative). In 5/65 patients, chemotherapy treatment was modified on the basis of PET findings.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data confirm the high accuracy of FDG-PET/CT in staging HL and NHL. FDG-PET/CT should therefore be used routinely in the initial evaluation of both patient subgroups.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-five consecutive patients (30 HL and 35 NHL) who underwent conventional disease staging and FDG-PET/CT were included. Concordance between conventional methods and PET was established when both procedures identified the same disease stage. Discordant findings were investigated further by using other diagnostic techniques (ultrasonography or magnetic resonance imaging) and/or clinical follow-up.
RESULTS: PET correctly staged 93.8% of enrolled patients (61/65), whereas conventional techniques correctly staged 89.2% (58/65; p=NS, Chi(2) test). There was complete concordance in 54/65 patients (83.1%); among the remaining 11 cases, PET upstaged eight patients (seven true positive and one false positive), and downstaged three (all false negative). In 5/65 patients, chemotherapy treatment was modified on the basis of PET findings.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data confirm the high accuracy of FDG-PET/CT in staging HL and NHL. FDG-PET/CT should therefore be used routinely in the initial evaluation of both patient subgroups.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app