Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Design of predictive models for positive outcomes of upper and lower gastrointestinal endoscopies in children and adolescents.

OBJECTIVES: To develop models to accurately determine the outcomes of diagnostic endoscopies performed in children and adolescents without known gastrointestinal disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective chart review of all endoscopies performed in children 2 to 18 years of age without known gastrointestinal disease from January 1 to December 31, 2000. The association between age, presenting symptoms, physical examination findings, laboratory investigations, and endoscopy outcomes was assessed. Predictive models for positive outcomes on endoscopy were estimated for upper and lower endoscopies separately by use of multiple logistic regression. Receiver operating curves were constructed to evaluate the performance of the models. A model with a sensitivity of 95% and specificity of 40% was considered clinically significant.

RESULTS: Positive findings on endoscopy were found in 191 (55%) of 346 and in 120 (59%) of 204 upper and lower endoscopies, respectively. Age above 13 years, vomiting, and hypoalbuminemia were significant predictors of positive upper endoscopies. Rectal bleeding, hypoalbuminemia, and elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate were significant predictors of positive lower endoscopies. Extrapolating from the receiver operating curves, a sensitivity of 95% corresponded to a specificity of 10% for the upper endoscopy model and 30% for the lower endoscopy model.

CONCLUSIONS: In our population of children and adolescents, several clinical characteristics were predictive of positive upper and lower endoscopy outcomes. Predictive models composed of these clinical variables were statistically, but not clinically, significant. The inclusion of additional clinical characteristics that could be assessed in prospective studies will likely improve the clinical significance of endoscopy outcome prediction.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app