Comparative Study
Journal Article
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Comparative evaluation of refractive surgery candidates with Placido topography, Orbscan II, Pentacam, and wavefront analysis.

PURPOSE: To study the role of the Pentacam (Oculus), Orbscan II (Bausch & Lomb), and WaveScan (Visx) in evaluating topographic features identified as risk factors for ectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis to identify parameters that may be important in interpreting elevation topography and wavefront data when screening refractive surgery candidates.

SETTING: Private practice, New York, New York, USA.

METHODS: One hundred forty-five eyes of 75 consecutive patients were evaluated for refractive surgery by ultrasound pachymetry (Humphrey Atlas), videokeratography, WaveScan, Orbscan II, and Pentacam. Eyes were classified as normal or suspect based on the Rabinowitz criteria for keratoconus suspect on Placido disk-based videokeratography. Forty-six parameters were evaluated in a comparison of topographically normal eyes and eyes that met the criteria for keratoconus suspect.

RESULTS: The suspect group had thinner pachymetry, multiple distinguishing characteristics on the anterior and posterior corneal surfaces by elevation topography, and larger amounts of coma by wavefront analysis. Multivariable regression analysis identified the following as the strongest predictors of a suspect Placido topography: Pentacam, thinner pachymetry and larger differences between the highest and lowest points on the posterior elevation; Orbscan II, higher anterior maximum elevation, horizontal location of the thinnest point on the pachymetry map, and larger differences between the highest and lowest points on the posterior elevation.

CONCLUSION: Several parameters provided by the Pentacam, Orbscan II, WaveScan, and pachymetry were statistically correlated with keratoconus suspect, defined by higher asymmetry and steeper curvature on Placido topography.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app