COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Comparing glaucomatous optic neuropathy in primary open angle and primary angle closure glaucoma eyes by scanning laser polarimetry-variable corneal compensation.

PURPOSE: To study the retinal nerve fiber layer thickness difference between high-tension primary open angle glaucoma (HT-POAG) and primary angle closure glaucoma (PACG) eyes using scanning laser polarimetry-variable corneal compensation (GDx VCC) in Taiwan-Chinese population; to evaluate the usefulness of the GDx VCC for detecting POAG and PACG eyes in Taiwan-Chinese population.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study comprised 88 early to moderate glaucomatous eyes (one randomly selected eye from 47 HT-POAG patients and 41 PACG patients) and the control group consisted of 45 age-matched eyes from 45 normal individuals. Each subject underwent retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurement by GDx VCC and Humphrey Field Analyzer visual field testing. Measured GDx VCC parameters were compared among groups. We also calculated the area under the receive operator characteristic (AROC) curve, corresponding sensitivity/specificity and best cut off value for each parameter in differentiating normal from POAG and PACG eyes.

RESULTS: There was no significant difference between HT-POAG and PACG eyes in each parameter. The parameter with the best AROC curve for differentiating normal from POAG eye was nerve fiber indicator (AROC, 0.779; sensitivity=57.4%, specificity=100%; best cut off value >27). The parameter with the best AROC curves for differentiating normal from PACG eyes was temporal-superior-nasal-inferior-temporal average (AROC, 0.829; sensitivity=46.3%, specificity=100%, best cut off value <51.7).

CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference between the HT-POAG and PACG eyes as far as the various parameters were concerned. GDx VCC shows fair discriminating ability in distinguishing normal from POAG and PACG eyes in Taiwan Chinese population.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app