We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Exercise tolerance and thermoregulatory responses during cycling in boys and men.
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 2008 Februrary
PURPOSE: Physiological responses to exercise in the heat differ between prepubertal children and young adults. Whether these maturity-related variations imply lower exercise tolerance, inferior thermoregulation, and greater risk for heat injury in the child is uncertain. This study directly compared thermoregulatory and cardiovascular responses as well as endurance performance between prepubertal boys and adult males during steady-load cycling in moderately hot and cool ambient conditions with moderate humidity.
METHODS: Eight prepubertal boys (age 11.7 +/- 0.4 yr) and eight adult men (age 31.8 +/- 2.0 yr) performed steady-load cycling to exhaustion at an intensity equivalent to approximately 65% peak V O2 in both hot (approximately 31 degrees C) and cool (approximately 19 degrees C) environments, with fluid intake ad libitum.
RESULTS: Exercise duration in the heat was shorter for both groups (hot: men 30.46 +/- 8.84 min, boys 29.30 +/- 6.19 min; cold: men 42.88 +/- 11.79 min, boys 41.38 +/- 6.30 min), with no significant difference between men and boys (P > 0.05). Increases in rectal temperature, heart rate, and cardiac index were similar between groups and conditions. Stroke index, mean arterial pressure, and arterial venous oxygen difference were stable and similar in both conditions, without group differences. No significant dehydration was observed in men or boys.
CONCLUSIONS: This study failed to reveal differences in exercise tolerance, thermoregulatory adaptation, or cardiovascular response to exercise in the heat between euhydrated prepubertal boys and adult men.
METHODS: Eight prepubertal boys (age 11.7 +/- 0.4 yr) and eight adult men (age 31.8 +/- 2.0 yr) performed steady-load cycling to exhaustion at an intensity equivalent to approximately 65% peak V O2 in both hot (approximately 31 degrees C) and cool (approximately 19 degrees C) environments, with fluid intake ad libitum.
RESULTS: Exercise duration in the heat was shorter for both groups (hot: men 30.46 +/- 8.84 min, boys 29.30 +/- 6.19 min; cold: men 42.88 +/- 11.79 min, boys 41.38 +/- 6.30 min), with no significant difference between men and boys (P > 0.05). Increases in rectal temperature, heart rate, and cardiac index were similar between groups and conditions. Stroke index, mean arterial pressure, and arterial venous oxygen difference were stable and similar in both conditions, without group differences. No significant dehydration was observed in men or boys.
CONCLUSIONS: This study failed to reveal differences in exercise tolerance, thermoregulatory adaptation, or cardiovascular response to exercise in the heat between euhydrated prepubertal boys and adult men.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app