CASE REPORTS
COMPARATIVE STUDY
ENGLISH ABSTRACT
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

[Fiberscope-guided tracheal intubation using two different kinds of laryngeal mask].

We experienced two cases of difficult airway management using laryngeal mask airway (LMA) in children. LMA Classic (LMA-C) was used for a 4-year-old female patient and SOFTSEAL LMA (LMA-S) was used for a 15-year-old female patient. Both patients were successfully intubated by fiberoptic tracheal intubation through LMA. We compare these two kinds of LMA in fiberoptic intubation method. Because the diameter of the shaft is wider than LMA-C, LMA-S could pass through much larger size endotracheal tube (ETT). 4.0 mm ETT could pass through LMA #1 and #1.5 in both LMAs. 5.0 mm ETT could pass through LMA-S #2, but only 4.5 mm ETT could pass through LMA-C #2. In #2.5, LMA-S and LMA-C could be passed by 6.0 mm ETT and 5.5 mm ETT respectively. Also LMA-S and LMA-C #3 could be passed by 7.0 mm ETT and 6.5 mm ETT respectively. We conclude that SOFTSEAL LMA is more useful than LMA Classic for fiberoptic tracheal intubation technique.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app