We have located links that may give you full text access.
English Abstract
Journal Article
[Microtitration of anti-RH1 antibodies: interest in the follow-up of pregnant women].
Transfusion Clinique et Biologique : Journal de la Société Française de Transfusion Sanguine 2007 October
UNLABELLED: The proposal for a 300 microg anti-RH1 injection at 28 GW by RH:-1 pregnant women complicates the interpretation of the screening for alloantibodies during pregnancy; to distinguish an alloantibody from a passive one is nevertheless important for the care of the patients. Testing a technique allowing this distinction seems thus necessary.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The technique of microtitration of anti- RH1 antibodies is an indirect antiglobulin test. Two hundred specimens were tested in comparison with a standard prepared from a national anti- RH1 standard. If the anti- RH1 concentration measured is lower or equal to the expected concentration, there is a passive antibody. If the concentration is largely higher, we can suspect an allo-immunization.
RESULTS: With this technique, 38 alloanti- RH1 and 112 passive anti- RH1 antibodies were confirmed. Twenty-five diagnosis were modified: seven alloanti- RH1 initially labeled passive and 18 passive anti- RH1 previously considered as alloantibodies. 15 cases can not be concluded, because the blood sample was taking away too early after the injection, and 10 cases are on standby, waiting for a control.
DISCUSSION: The microtitration is an important exam in the follow-up of the RH:-1 pregnant women when an anti-RH1 antibody is found. This exam should be offered each time we have no information about the anti-D injection, or when an incoherent reaction compared to the presumed date of injection is observed.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The technique of microtitration of anti- RH1 antibodies is an indirect antiglobulin test. Two hundred specimens were tested in comparison with a standard prepared from a national anti- RH1 standard. If the anti- RH1 concentration measured is lower or equal to the expected concentration, there is a passive antibody. If the concentration is largely higher, we can suspect an allo-immunization.
RESULTS: With this technique, 38 alloanti- RH1 and 112 passive anti- RH1 antibodies were confirmed. Twenty-five diagnosis were modified: seven alloanti- RH1 initially labeled passive and 18 passive anti- RH1 previously considered as alloantibodies. 15 cases can not be concluded, because the blood sample was taking away too early after the injection, and 10 cases are on standby, waiting for a control.
DISCUSSION: The microtitration is an important exam in the follow-up of the RH:-1 pregnant women when an anti-RH1 antibody is found. This exam should be offered each time we have no information about the anti-D injection, or when an incoherent reaction compared to the presumed date of injection is observed.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app