We have located links that may give you full text access.
Longitudinal changes in temporomandibular disorders in young adults: indication for systematic temporomandibular joint screening.
Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics 2007 November
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate longitudinal changes in temporomandibular joint function in young adults in terms of clinical and subclinical temporomandibular disorders (TMD), and to identify patients at risk for clinically manifest TMD.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Ninety-one consecutive dental students were surveyed over a mean period of 2.4 years. The temporomandibular joint and masticatory muscles were analyzed by means of the Manual Functional Analysis. Examinations took place during the first (T1) and sixth (T2) terms of dental training.
RESULTS: The prevalence of subclinical TMD decreased from 16.5% to 15.4%, while that of clinical TMD rose from 19.8% (T1) to 24.2% (T2). Subjects with subclinical TMD at T1 showed the most pronounced fluctuation, and were about equally likely to improve, remain stable or deteriorate. The incidence of clinical TMD in the subclinical TMD-group was 28.6%, that is, almost every third subject developed clinical TMD over a 2.4-year period.
CONCLUSIONS: Should clinical TMD become apparent during orthodontic treatment, the patient might attribute it to the therapy, rather than to the subclinical disorder at baseline. It thus makes therapeutic and forensic sense to carry out systematic TMJ-screening in all adult patients prior to orthodontic treatment, in order to identify patients at risk.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Ninety-one consecutive dental students were surveyed over a mean period of 2.4 years. The temporomandibular joint and masticatory muscles were analyzed by means of the Manual Functional Analysis. Examinations took place during the first (T1) and sixth (T2) terms of dental training.
RESULTS: The prevalence of subclinical TMD decreased from 16.5% to 15.4%, while that of clinical TMD rose from 19.8% (T1) to 24.2% (T2). Subjects with subclinical TMD at T1 showed the most pronounced fluctuation, and were about equally likely to improve, remain stable or deteriorate. The incidence of clinical TMD in the subclinical TMD-group was 28.6%, that is, almost every third subject developed clinical TMD over a 2.4-year period.
CONCLUSIONS: Should clinical TMD become apparent during orthodontic treatment, the patient might attribute it to the therapy, rather than to the subclinical disorder at baseline. It thus makes therapeutic and forensic sense to carry out systematic TMJ-screening in all adult patients prior to orthodontic treatment, in order to identify patients at risk.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app