We have located links that may give you full text access.
Electrocardiographic imaging of patients with heart failure with left bundle branch block and response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Journal of Electrocardiology 2007 November
BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) for patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) and left ventricular (LV) dysfunction has variable responses. We hypothesized that conduction delays in intrinsic rhythm and responses to pacing may be influenced by electrophysiologic substrate. To determine this, we used electrocardiographic imaging (ECGI), which maps epicardial ventricular excitation noninvasively.
METHODS AND RESULTS: Electrocardiographic imaging was conducted in 8 patients undergoing CRT. During intrinsic conduction with LBBB (6 patients), ventricular activation was heterogeneous, with regions of delayed and/or absent conduction, reflecting varied LV pathology. Latest LV activation occurred in the lateral LV base in 3 patients but variably in the remainder. The anterior LV was susceptible to block and slow conduction. Cardiac resynchronization therapy usually improved interventricular electrical synchrony, but this did not correlate with changes in QRS duration. In some patients, during CRT, regions of slow conduction appeared in the LV in response to pacing, indicating functional electrical characteristics of local tissue.
CONCLUSION: In LBBB and LV dysfunction, LV activation is heterogenous and unpredictable, with areas of slow and/or absent conduction. Functional lines of block generate complex barriers and may interfere with paced wave fronts. Thus, patient-specific electrophysiologic substrate properties may determine outcome of CRT.
METHODS AND RESULTS: Electrocardiographic imaging was conducted in 8 patients undergoing CRT. During intrinsic conduction with LBBB (6 patients), ventricular activation was heterogeneous, with regions of delayed and/or absent conduction, reflecting varied LV pathology. Latest LV activation occurred in the lateral LV base in 3 patients but variably in the remainder. The anterior LV was susceptible to block and slow conduction. Cardiac resynchronization therapy usually improved interventricular electrical synchrony, but this did not correlate with changes in QRS duration. In some patients, during CRT, regions of slow conduction appeared in the LV in response to pacing, indicating functional electrical characteristics of local tissue.
CONCLUSION: In LBBB and LV dysfunction, LV activation is heterogenous and unpredictable, with areas of slow and/or absent conduction. Functional lines of block generate complex barriers and may interfere with paced wave fronts. Thus, patient-specific electrophysiologic substrate properties may determine outcome of CRT.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app