Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Characterization of c4d immunostaining utilizing paraffin-embedded tissue of nonpresensitized pediatric heart transplant patients.

Immunoperoxidase techniques for demonstration of complement split product C4d on paraffin-embedded endomyocardial biopsy samples have been used for the evaluation of humoral rejection mainly in adult heart transplantation. Interpretation of suspected humoral rejection in children requires knowledge of the pattern and frequency of C4d deposition in nonpresensitized pediatric heart transplantation patients. Paraffin-embedded endomyocardial biopsy samples of 65 patients with no rejection, acute cellular rejection (ACR), or early ischemic/reperfusion injury were studied. Six biopsies within each grade of ACR both early (<6 months) and late (>6 months) after heart transplantation were reviewed, as were 5 biopsies of ischemic/reperfusion injury. None of the subjects was sensitized prior to transplant. All slides were blindly evaluated for histologic features traditionally associated with humoral rejection. C4d staining was quantified by counting the number of positive capillaries in 10 random high-power fields (hpf). C4d positivity (C4d+) was defined as >10 capillaries/10 hpf. C4d+ was observed in 6 (9%) endomyocardial biopsy samples; 2 in the early and 4 in the late ACR groups. Four had ACR grades 1A/B, and 2 had grade 3B/4. Thirteen (20%) endomyocardial biopsy samples had histologic features suggestive of humoral rejection. Of these, only 2 were C4d+ and both had ACR grade 3B/4. No C4d+ staining was found in the ischemic/reperfusion injury group. C4d immunostaining was negative in endomyocardial biopsy samples of the majority of our patients (91%). Endomyocardial biopsy samples with C4d+ did not show consistent ACR grade or time specificity. Contrary to previously reported data, none of the ischemic/reperfusion injury endomyocardial biopsy samples was C4d+, and histologic features alone were poor predictors of C4d+.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app