We have located links that may give you full text access.
Predictive validity and responsiveness of the functional ambulation category in hemiparetic patients after stroke.
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2007 October
OBJECTIVE: To determine the reliability, concurrent and predictive validity, and responsiveness of the Functional Ambulation Category (FAC) in hemiparetic patients after stroke.
DESIGN: Prospective cohort.
SETTING: An early rehabilitation center for patients with neurologic disorders.
PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-five nonambulatory patients after first-ever stroke, with duration of illness between 30 and 60 days, were included.
INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: FAC, Rivermead Mobility Index (RMI), walking velocity, step length, and six-minute walking test (6MWT) were assessed at the beginning, after 2 and 4 weeks of rehabilitation, and again 6 months later. After 6 months, community ambulation was also assessed. Test-retest and interrater reliability, concurrent, discriminant, and predictive validity and responsiveness of the FAC were calculated.
RESULTS: Based on video examinations, high test-retest reliability (Cohen kappa=.950) and interrater reliability (kappa=.905) were found. FAC scores at the beginning and after 2 weeks, 3 weeks, and 6 months correlated highly with the RMI (Spearman rho=.686, rho=.787, rho=.825, rho=.893, respectively), distance walked in the 6MWT (rho=.949, rho=.937, rho=.931, rho=.906, respectively), walking velocity (rho=.952, rho=.939, rho=.902, rho=.901, respectively), and step length (rho=.952, rho=.932, rho=.896, rho=.877, respectively) at the same time points (all P<.001). The RMI, walking velocity, step length, and distance walked in the 6MWT differed for each FAC category (P<.001). After 4 weeks of rehabilitation, an FAC score of 4 or higher predicted community ambulation at 6 months with 100% sensitivity and 78% specificity. FAC scores changed significantly between the first 2 and second 2 weeks (Wilcoxon z=8.7, z=7.9, respectively; both P<.001) of the inpatient rehabilitation program.
CONCLUSIONS: The FAC has excellent reliability, good concurrent and predictive validity, and good responsiveness in patients with hemiparesis after stroke.
DESIGN: Prospective cohort.
SETTING: An early rehabilitation center for patients with neurologic disorders.
PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-five nonambulatory patients after first-ever stroke, with duration of illness between 30 and 60 days, were included.
INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: FAC, Rivermead Mobility Index (RMI), walking velocity, step length, and six-minute walking test (6MWT) were assessed at the beginning, after 2 and 4 weeks of rehabilitation, and again 6 months later. After 6 months, community ambulation was also assessed. Test-retest and interrater reliability, concurrent, discriminant, and predictive validity and responsiveness of the FAC were calculated.
RESULTS: Based on video examinations, high test-retest reliability (Cohen kappa=.950) and interrater reliability (kappa=.905) were found. FAC scores at the beginning and after 2 weeks, 3 weeks, and 6 months correlated highly with the RMI (Spearman rho=.686, rho=.787, rho=.825, rho=.893, respectively), distance walked in the 6MWT (rho=.949, rho=.937, rho=.931, rho=.906, respectively), walking velocity (rho=.952, rho=.939, rho=.902, rho=.901, respectively), and step length (rho=.952, rho=.932, rho=.896, rho=.877, respectively) at the same time points (all P<.001). The RMI, walking velocity, step length, and distance walked in the 6MWT differed for each FAC category (P<.001). After 4 weeks of rehabilitation, an FAC score of 4 or higher predicted community ambulation at 6 months with 100% sensitivity and 78% specificity. FAC scores changed significantly between the first 2 and second 2 weeks (Wilcoxon z=8.7, z=7.9, respectively; both P<.001) of the inpatient rehabilitation program.
CONCLUSIONS: The FAC has excellent reliability, good concurrent and predictive validity, and good responsiveness in patients with hemiparesis after stroke.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices 
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app