We have located links that may give you full text access.
The impact of ambulance diversion on EMS resource availability.
Prehospital Emergency Care 2007 October
OBJECTIVE: Ambulance diversion has been proposed as a solution to emergency department overcrowding and waiting room deaths. For ethical and legal reasons, it remains highly controversial. The impact on EMS resources is not known. This study seeks to determine how diversion impacts the availability of ambulance resources, specifically transport time, hospital turnaround, and total out-of-service time.
METHODS: All emergency ambulance responses in 2002 while one of the city's hospitals was on diversion were collected, including those responses during the hour of the diversion and 30 minutes before and after. The time intervals for these responses were time and date matched to 2001, if no hospital was on diversion. Total out-of-service time (911 to availability for another call), time from departure from scene to arrival at hospital (transport interval), and time from arrival at hospital to availability for another call (turnaround time) were compared by using a t-test.
RESULTS: The 1,563 instances of diversion were included, with 1,403 controls. Interim analysis allowed calculation of a sample size of 1,049 in each group to show a 2-minute difference in turnaround time and 330 calls in each for a 5-minute difference in total out-of-service time (0.25 SD). Transport, hospital turnaround, and total out-of-service times were not different between diversion and control time periods. This relies on the accuracy of the status button system and may not generalize to systems with different geography, diversion policy, number of hospitals, or handling of interfacility transfers.
CONCLUSION: The availability of EMS resources is maintained during times of ambulance diversion. Diversion avoids potential delays associated with sending ambulances to overwhelmed emergency departments.
METHODS: All emergency ambulance responses in 2002 while one of the city's hospitals was on diversion were collected, including those responses during the hour of the diversion and 30 minutes before and after. The time intervals for these responses were time and date matched to 2001, if no hospital was on diversion. Total out-of-service time (911 to availability for another call), time from departure from scene to arrival at hospital (transport interval), and time from arrival at hospital to availability for another call (turnaround time) were compared by using a t-test.
RESULTS: The 1,563 instances of diversion were included, with 1,403 controls. Interim analysis allowed calculation of a sample size of 1,049 in each group to show a 2-minute difference in turnaround time and 330 calls in each for a 5-minute difference in total out-of-service time (0.25 SD). Transport, hospital turnaround, and total out-of-service times were not different between diversion and control time periods. This relies on the accuracy of the status button system and may not generalize to systems with different geography, diversion policy, number of hospitals, or handling of interfacility transfers.
CONCLUSION: The availability of EMS resources is maintained during times of ambulance diversion. Diversion avoids potential delays associated with sending ambulances to overwhelmed emergency departments.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app