JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Babies born after ART treatment cost more than non-ART babies: a cost analysis of inpatient birth-admission costs of singleton and multiple gestation pregnancies.

Human Reproduction 2007 December
BACKGROUND: Currently, about one-third of infants born after assisted reproductive technology (ART) worldwide are twins or triplets. This study compared the inpatient birth-admission costs of singleton and multiple gestation ART deliveries to non-ART deliveries.

METHODS: A cohort of 5005 mothers and 5886 infants conceived following ART treatment were compared to 245 249 mothers and 248 539 infants in the general population. Birth-admission costs were calculated using Australian Refined Diagnosis Related Groups and weighted national average costs (2003-2004 euro).

RESULTS: ART infants were 4.4 times more likely to be low birthweight (LBW) compared with non-ART infants, translating into 89% higher birth-admission costs (euro2,832 and euro1,502, respectively). ART singletons were also more likely to be LBW compared with non-ART singletons, translating into 31% higher birth-admission costs (euro1,849 and euro1,415, respectively). After combining infant and maternal admission costs, the average cost of an ART singleton delivery was euro4,818 compared with euro13 890 for ART twins and euro54 294 for ART higher order multiples. Findings were not sensitive to changes in casemix.

CONCLUSIONS: The poorer neonatal outcomes of ART singletons compared with non-ART singletons are significant enough to impact healthcare resource consumption. The high costs associated with ART multiple births add to the overwhelming clinical and economic evidence in support of single embryo transfer.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app