We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Ultrasound-guided versus landmark-guided femoral vein access in pediatric cardiac catheterization.
Pediatric Cardiology 2008 March
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate whether an ultrasound-guided technique can improve upon a landmark-guided technique in achieving femoral vein access in pediatric cardiac catheterization.
METHODS: This study examined 87 consecutive subjects with a median age of 2 years (range, 1 month to 19 years) who had congenital or other heart disease. Femoral vein puncture was attempted using either an ultrasound-guided technique (US group, n = 43) or a landmark-guided technique (LM group, n = 44). The patients were assigned alternately to either an ultrasound- or landmark-guided group. Overall success and traumatic complication rates were compared between the two groups, as well as the influence of patient size and age.
RESULTS: The overall rate of success in achieving femoral vein access did not differ between the two groups. Among the successful cases in the two groups, there were no significant differences in patient size or age. Inadvertent femoral artery puncture occurred with 3 (7%) of 43 patients in the US group and with 14 (31.8%) of 44 patients in the LM group, for a significantly higher complication rate in the LM group (p < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound-guided access to the femoral vein minimizes the complication of inadvertent arterial puncture as compared with the landmark-guided approach.
METHODS: This study examined 87 consecutive subjects with a median age of 2 years (range, 1 month to 19 years) who had congenital or other heart disease. Femoral vein puncture was attempted using either an ultrasound-guided technique (US group, n = 43) or a landmark-guided technique (LM group, n = 44). The patients were assigned alternately to either an ultrasound- or landmark-guided group. Overall success and traumatic complication rates were compared between the two groups, as well as the influence of patient size and age.
RESULTS: The overall rate of success in achieving femoral vein access did not differ between the two groups. Among the successful cases in the two groups, there were no significant differences in patient size or age. Inadvertent femoral artery puncture occurred with 3 (7%) of 43 patients in the US group and with 14 (31.8%) of 44 patients in the LM group, for a significantly higher complication rate in the LM group (p < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound-guided access to the femoral vein minimizes the complication of inadvertent arterial puncture as compared with the landmark-guided approach.
Full text links
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app