Comparative Study
English Abstract
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

[A static mechanical comparison between two transarticular internal fixation techniques in the lower cervical spine].

OBJECTIVE: To compare static mechanical difference between two transarticular internal fixation techniques in the lower cervical spine.

METHODS: Ten fresh human cadaveric cervical spines were harvested. On one side, transarticular pedicle screws were placed at the C3-4, C5-6, and C7-T1 levels, and transarticular screws were placed on the other side. The screw insertion technique at each level was randomized for right or left. The starting point for transarticular pedicle screw insertion was located at the midpoint of the inferolateral quadrant of the lateral mass and the direction of the screw was about 50 degrees caudally in the sagittal plane and about 45 degrees medially in the axial plane, and the starting point for transarticular screw insertion was 1 mm medial to the midpoint of the lateral mass, aiming in a 15 - 20 degrees caudally and 35 - 40 degrees lateral position. After screw placement, each set of vertebral bodies were mounted in a custom jig for axial pullout testing using a servohydraulic testing machine. The load-displacement curves were obtained for each screw pullout.

RESULTS: The mean pullout strength for the transarticular pedicle screws was 668 N. This compares with 414 N for the transarticular screws (P < 0.05), but there was not significant difference statistically between different cervical levels (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION: The static mechanical strength of transarticular pedicle screws is superior to the transarticular screws, and the transarticular pedicle screw fixation has the biomechanical feasibility of clinical application.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app