Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Prevalence and associated risk factors for intervention in 313 children with subaortic stenosis.

BACKGROUND: We sought to determine the prevalence of intervention and associated factors in children presenting with subaortic stenosis. We also investigated whether a protocol adopted in 1994 of early subaortic resection at a preoperative mean systolic gradient across the left ventricular outflow tract (LV gradient) greater than 30 mm Hg was supported by longitudinal outcomes.

METHODS: Record review of all children (n = 313) diagnosed with subaortic stenosis was conducted between 1975 and 1998 at our institution. Cox proportional hazard models determined the prevalence and associated factors for initial subaortic resection. Mixed models of serially obtained echocardiographic data (n = 933) established longitudinal LV gradient trends and identified factors associated with more rapid LV gradient progression.

RESULTS: Median age at presentation was 8 months. Freedom from initial subaortic resection was 40% at 16 years from diagnosis. Earlier progression to subaortic resection was associated with patient characteristics at presentation, including a higher initial LV gradient (p < 0.001), larger aortic annulus z-score (p = 0.005), smaller body surface area (p < 0.001), and smaller mitral annulus z-score (p = 0.003). Initial resection was also associated with a faster rate of LV gradient progression (p = 0.003). Factors determining the increased rate of LV gradient progression included an initial LV gradient greater than 30 mm Hg (p < 0.001), initial aortic valve thickening (p = 0.003), and attachment of subaortic stenosis to the mitral valve (p = 0.003). Worse aortic regurgitation grade with time was also associated with an initial LV gradient greater than 30 mm Hg (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS: Subaortic resection should be delayed until the LV gradient exceeds 30 mm Hg because most children with an initial LV gradient less than 30 mm Hg have quiescent disease.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app