JOURNAL ARTICLE
REVIEW
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Closed claims studies in anesthesia: a literature review and implications for practice.

AANA Journal 2007 August
Historically, closed malpractice claims have been used to identify and examine potential causes for adverse anesthesia outcomes. In the United States, the American Association of Nurse Anesthetists and the American Society of Anesthesiologists have compiled and analyzed such data. In all claims filed, respiratory events were most common, and the most common outcome class was brain damage or death. These findings and others led to improved practice standards, including end-tidal carbon dioxide and pulse oximetry monitoring. Although some researchers have cited closed claims studies as evidence of anesthesia risk trends, the nature of the data makes it inappropriate for calculation or comparison of risk. Further work is needed to elucidate some mechanisms of injury and to develop interventions to maximize patient safety.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app