Comparative Study
Journal Article
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

An in-vitro and in-vivo comparison of the activity of beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations with imipenem and cephalosporins against Escherichia coli producing TEM-1 or TEM-2 beta-lactamase.

Reference strains of Escherichia coli (ampicillin-susceptible and -resistant ATCC strains, and known TEM-1 and TEM-2 beta-lactamase producers) were tested in vitro and in the in-vivo mouse thigh infection model against four beta-lactamase inhibitor compounds (BICs: amoxycillin/clavulanic acid, ampicillin/sulbactam, ticarcillin/clavulanic acid, and piperacillin/tazobactam), selected cephalosporins, and imipenem. The ATCC strains (ampicillin-susceptible and -resistant) were susceptible to the BICs in disc and MIC tests. Three or more logs of killing were observed at the NCCLS breakpoint concentrations. However, the TEM-1 and TEM-2 producers were resistant in disc tests to ampicillin/sulbactam and amoxycillin/clavulanic acid, and showed intermediate susceptibility to ticarcillin/clavulanic acid. MICs were at or near the breakpoint, but bactericidal activity was only noted at the probable breakpoint concentration of piperacillin/tazobactam. Cefoxitin, cefotaxime, cefpirome and imipenem, but not cephalothin, showed greater bactericidal activity and lower MICs for the TEM-producing strains than the BICs. The viable count of the TEM-1 producer was not reduced in the mouse thigh model by ampicillin/sulbactam or amoxycillin/clavulanic acid, but cefpirome and cefotaxime reduced the viable count by approximately three logs. There was a 50% mortality rate in mice receiving the two BICs. The ampicillin-susceptible ATCC strain of E. coli was killed to a similar degree by all agents tested. Overall, the BICs appeared inferior, in both in-vivo and in-vitro tests to selected cephalosporins and imipenem when tested against reference strains of E. coli producing TEM-1 or TEM-2 beta-lactamase. The large inoculum effect and poor bactericidal activity observed with the BICs suggest they could be less effective in certain clinical situations.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app