We have located links that may give you full text access.
Case Reports
English Abstract
Journal Article
[Clinical features of spontaneous spinal epidural hematoma and influential factors of its prognosis].
OBJECTIVE: To explore the clinical features of spontaneous spinal epidural hematoma (SSEH) and to find out factors influencing its prognosis.
METHODS: From September 1998 to October 2006, 23 patients with SSEH (10 males and 13 females) were treated. Their ages ranged from 10 to 69 years. The primary neurological status were classified as grade A in 7 patients, B in 2 patients, C in 4 patients, D in 9 patients and E in 1 patients according to ASIA grading system. The progressive intervals of their symptoms were divided as four period: less than 12 hours (12 patients), 12 to 24 hours (2 patients), 24 to 48 hours (3 patients) and more than 48 hours (6 patients). SSEH was diagnosed by MRI or by histopathological examination. The cases history, laboratory examination, radiological image, treatment, pathological result and prognosis were recorded and analyzed after 3 month.
RESULTS: In 23 patients, there were 1 case of deterioration, 8 cases of no change, 9 cases of improvement and 5 cases of complete recovery. The gender had no correlation with prognosis (P>0.05). In the patients who had shorter progressive interval and more severe edema of spinal cord, the prognosis was worse (P<0.05). In the patients who had mild neurological deficit, the prognosis was good (P<0.01). In 17 patients undergoing surgery, the scores for prognosis was 1 point in 1 case, 2 points in 5 cases, 3 points in 6 cases and 4 points in 5 cases; the operation time had no correlation with prognosis (r = 0.056, P>0.05). In 6 patients undergoing conservative treatment, the scores for prognosis were 2 points and 3 points in 3 cases respectively.
CONCLUSION: Prognosis of patient with SSEH is influenced by his primary neurological status, progressive interval, spinal edema and size of hematoma. The major treatment is surgical evacuation of hematoma as early as possible to break the aggravation of spinal function. Conservative treatment is not considered unless the neurological defects recovered in the early period.
METHODS: From September 1998 to October 2006, 23 patients with SSEH (10 males and 13 females) were treated. Their ages ranged from 10 to 69 years. The primary neurological status were classified as grade A in 7 patients, B in 2 patients, C in 4 patients, D in 9 patients and E in 1 patients according to ASIA grading system. The progressive intervals of their symptoms were divided as four period: less than 12 hours (12 patients), 12 to 24 hours (2 patients), 24 to 48 hours (3 patients) and more than 48 hours (6 patients). SSEH was diagnosed by MRI or by histopathological examination. The cases history, laboratory examination, radiological image, treatment, pathological result and prognosis were recorded and analyzed after 3 month.
RESULTS: In 23 patients, there were 1 case of deterioration, 8 cases of no change, 9 cases of improvement and 5 cases of complete recovery. The gender had no correlation with prognosis (P>0.05). In the patients who had shorter progressive interval and more severe edema of spinal cord, the prognosis was worse (P<0.05). In the patients who had mild neurological deficit, the prognosis was good (P<0.01). In 17 patients undergoing surgery, the scores for prognosis was 1 point in 1 case, 2 points in 5 cases, 3 points in 6 cases and 4 points in 5 cases; the operation time had no correlation with prognosis (r = 0.056, P>0.05). In 6 patients undergoing conservative treatment, the scores for prognosis were 2 points and 3 points in 3 cases respectively.
CONCLUSION: Prognosis of patient with SSEH is influenced by his primary neurological status, progressive interval, spinal edema and size of hematoma. The major treatment is surgical evacuation of hematoma as early as possible to break the aggravation of spinal function. Conservative treatment is not considered unless the neurological defects recovered in the early period.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app