Case Reports
English Abstract
Journal Article
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

[Clinical features of spontaneous spinal epidural hematoma and influential factors of its prognosis].

OBJECTIVE: To explore the clinical features of spontaneous spinal epidural hematoma (SSEH) and to find out factors influencing its prognosis.

METHODS: From September 1998 to October 2006, 23 patients with SSEH (10 males and 13 females) were treated. Their ages ranged from 10 to 69 years. The primary neurological status were classified as grade A in 7 patients, B in 2 patients, C in 4 patients, D in 9 patients and E in 1 patients according to ASIA grading system. The progressive intervals of their symptoms were divided as four period: less than 12 hours (12 patients), 12 to 24 hours (2 patients), 24 to 48 hours (3 patients) and more than 48 hours (6 patients). SSEH was diagnosed by MRI or by histopathological examination. The cases history, laboratory examination, radiological image, treatment, pathological result and prognosis were recorded and analyzed after 3 month.

RESULTS: In 23 patients, there were 1 case of deterioration, 8 cases of no change, 9 cases of improvement and 5 cases of complete recovery. The gender had no correlation with prognosis (P>0.05). In the patients who had shorter progressive interval and more severe edema of spinal cord, the prognosis was worse (P<0.05). In the patients who had mild neurological deficit, the prognosis was good (P<0.01). In 17 patients undergoing surgery, the scores for prognosis was 1 point in 1 case, 2 points in 5 cases, 3 points in 6 cases and 4 points in 5 cases; the operation time had no correlation with prognosis (r = 0.056, P>0.05). In 6 patients undergoing conservative treatment, the scores for prognosis were 2 points and 3 points in 3 cases respectively.

CONCLUSION: Prognosis of patient with SSEH is influenced by his primary neurological status, progressive interval, spinal edema and size of hematoma. The major treatment is surgical evacuation of hematoma as early as possible to break the aggravation of spinal function. Conservative treatment is not considered unless the neurological defects recovered in the early period.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app