The rationale for navigated minimally invasive unicompartmental knee replacement

Jean-Yves Jenny, Eugen Ciobanu, Cyril Boeri
Clinical Orthopaedics and related Research 2007, 463: 58-62
Computer-aided systems have been developed recently to improve the precision of implantation of unicompartmental or total knee replacements. Minimally invasive techniques were developed to decrease the surgical trauma related to prosthesis implantation. However, there are concerns about loss of implant positioning accuracy with minimally invasive techniques. Minimally invasive instruments have been adapted for use with a typical 6-cm skin incision for unicompartmental knee replacement. We prospectively studied 60 patients who had minimally invasive navigated UKA and compared them with an earlier group of 60 patients who underwent open navigated UKA. We used an intraoperative non-image-based navigation system. Minimally invasive navigated implantation of a UKA did not reduce the radio-graphic accuracy of the implantation compared to open navigated implantation. There were no major complications and little change from the conventional navigated operating technique. Because we do not yet know if navigation influences function and long-term survival, our conclusions need to be confirmed on a larger scale.

Full Text Links

Find Full Text Links for this Article


You are not logged in. Sign Up or Log In to join the discussion.

Related Papers

Remove bar
Read by QxMD icon Read

Save your favorite articles in one place with a free QxMD account.


Search Tips

Use Boolean operators: AND/OR

diabetic AND foot
diabetes OR diabetic

Exclude a word using the 'minus' sign

Virchow -triad

Use Parentheses

water AND (cup OR glass)

Add an asterisk (*) at end of a word to include word stems

Neuro* will search for Neurology, Neuroscientist, Neurological, and so on

Use quotes to search for an exact phrase

"primary prevention of cancer"
(heart or cardiac or cardio*) AND arrest -"American Heart Association"