Small hepatocellular carcinomas in cirrhosis: differences in contrast enhancement effects between helical CT and MR imaging during multiphasic dynamic imaging.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate differences in the degrees of contrast enhancement effects of small hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) in patients with cirrhosis between helical computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging during multiphasic contrast-enhanced dynamic imaging and to determine the diagnostic value of MR imaging especially in assessing hypovascular HCCs detected as hypoattenuating nodules on late-phase CT.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS: This study included 64 small HCCs (<3 cm in diameter) in 40 patients with chronic hepatitis or cirrhosis who underwent multiphasic (arterial, portal and late phases) contrast-enhanced dynamic helical CT and MR imaging. The contrast enhancement patterns of each lesion in the arterial and late phases were evaluated by two radiologists experienced in liver MR imaging and categorized as one of five grades (1=hypoattenuated/hypointense; 2=slightly hypoattenuated/hypointense; 3=isoattenuated/isointense; 4=slightly hyperattenuated/hyperintense; 5=hyperattenuated/hyperintense), compared with the surrounding liver parenchyma.

RESULT: Forty-three (67%) of 64 lesions showed Grade 4 (n=24) or Grade 5 (n=19) enhancement on arterial-phase CT, while 51 (80%) of 64 lesions showed Grade 4 (n=20) or Grade 5 (n=31) enhancement on arterial-phase MR imaging, indicating hypervascular HCCs. The grading score of hypervascular HCCs on arterial-phase MR imaging (mean: 4.61) was significantly (P<.01) higher than that for hypervascular HCCs on arterial-phase CT (mean: 4.20), showing better detection of the hypervascularity (arterial enhancement) of the lesion on arterial-phase MR imaging. Regarding hypovascular HCCs, all (100%) of 21 hypovascular HCCs on CT showed Grade 1 (n=10) or Grade 2 (n=11) enhancement on late-phase CT, seen as hypoattenuation. In contrast, 8 (62%) of 13 hypovascular HCCs on MR imaging showed Grade 1 (n=1) or Grade 2 (n=7) enhancement on late-phase MR imaging, seen as hypointensity. Grading scores of hypovascular HCCs on late-phase images were significantly (P<.001) lower on CT than on MR imaging (mean score: 1.52 vs. 2.31), indicating better washout effects for hypovascular HCCs on late-phase CT.

CONCLUSION: The washout effects for small HCCs on late-phase MR imaging were inferior to those for small HCCs on late-phase CT. Especially, hypovascular HCCs demonstrated as hypoattenuating nodules on late-phase CT were often not seen on late-phase MR imaging, requiring careful evaluation of other sequences, including unenhanced T(1)-weighted and T(2)-weighted MR images.